BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Los Angeles California hospital construction expert witness Los Angeles California housing expert witness Los Angeles California retail construction expert witness Los Angeles California parking structure expert witness Los Angeles California low-income housing expert witness Los Angeles California casino resort expert witness Los Angeles California townhome construction expert witness Los Angeles California mid-rise construction expert witness Los Angeles California office building expert witness Los Angeles California landscaping construction expert witness Los Angeles California multi family housing expert witness Los Angeles California concrete tilt-up expert witness Los Angeles California production housing expert witness Los Angeles California condominium expert witness Los Angeles California tract home expert witness Los Angeles California Subterranean parking expert witness Los Angeles California high-rise construction expert witness Los Angeles California custom home expert witness Los Angeles California Medical building expert witness Los Angeles California institutional building expert witness Los Angeles California industrial building expert witness Los Angeles California
    Los Angeles California construction expert testimonyLos Angeles California construction claims expert witnessLos Angeles California construction project management expert witnessesLos Angeles California expert witness commercial buildingsLos Angeles California construction expert witnessLos Angeles California construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessLos Angeles California engineering expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Los Angeles, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Los Angeles California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Los Angeles California

    Insurance Company Must Show that Lead Came from Building Materials

    Hawaii State Senate Requires CGL Carriers to Submit Premium Information To State Legislature

    Insurer Rejects Claim on Dolphin Towers

    Florida trigger

    Mark Van Wonterghem To Serve as Senior Forensic Consultant in the Sacramento Offices of Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc.

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    Florida trigger

    Architect Not Responsible for Injuries to Guests

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    General Contractor/Developer May Not Rely on the Homeowner Protection Act to Avoid a Waiver of Consequential Damages in an AIA Contract

    Construction Defect Journal Marks First Anniversary

    North Carolina Exclusion j(6) “That Particular Part”

    Workers Hurt in Casino Floor Collapse

    Michigan Supreme Court Concludes No Statute of Repose on Breach of Contract

    Ohio “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    Coverage Rejected Under Owned Property and Alienated Property Exclusions

    Oregon agreement to procure insurance, anti-indemnity statute, and self-insured retention

    Limiting Plaintiffs’ Claims to a Cause of Action for Violation of SB-800

    The U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Rules on Greystone

    West Coast Casualty Promises Exciting Line Up at the Nineteenth Annual Conference

    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Court Grants Summary Judgment to Insurer in HVAC Defect Case

    Insurer Must Cover Construction Defects Claims under Actual Injury Rule

    LEED Certified Courthouse Square Negotiating With Insurers, Mulling Over Demolition

    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    Alabama “occurrence” and subcontractor work exception to the “your completed work” exclusion

    Counterpoint: Washington Supreme Court to Rule on Resulting Losses in Insurance Disputes

    Congress Addresses Homebuilding Credit Crunch

    More Charges in Las Vegas HOA Construction Defect Scam

    State Audit Questions College Construction Spending in LA

    Hawaii Building Codes to Stay in State Control

    No Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”

    Lien Law Unlikely To Change — Yet

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Florida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School Official

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion

    Seven Former North San Diego County Landfills are Leaking Contaminants

    Policyholder Fails to Build Adequate Record to Support Bad Faith Claim

    Construction Workers Unearth Bones

    Boston’s Tunnel Project Plagued by Water

    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    Construction Law Client Alert: California Is One Step Closer to Prohibiting Type I Indemnity Agreements In Private Commercial Projects

    Alaska Supreme Court Dismisses Claims of Uncooperative Pro Se Litigant in Defect Case

    Statute of Limitations Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Condo Board May Be Negligent for not Filing Construction Defect Suit in a Timely Fashion

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts

    Bad Faith and a Partial Summary Judgment in Seattle Construction Defect Case
    Corporate Profile

    LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Los Angeles, California Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Los Angeles' most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Los Angeles, California

    Harmon Tower Construction Defects Update: Who’s To Blame?

    August 17, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Reporting on the site VegasInc.com, Liz Benton notes that “nobody wants to take the fall for what happened at Harmon.” Work on the Harmon hotel building in Las Vegas’s CityCenter stopped in 2008 after 26 of the planned 49 stories were completed. Lorence Slutzky, a construction law professor at John Marshall Law School and a partner with the Chicago firm Robbins Schwartz Nicholas Lifton & Taylor told Benton that while inspectors and others are complicit, “the real responsibility rests with Perini, which has an obligation to comply with the plan specifications.” Perini’s claim is that they were given faulty design drawings. MGM disputes this.

    Perini has offered to repair the building defects, however MGM has released a statement that they have “zero confidence or trust that Perini can and will properly fix a building it has so badly constructed thus far.” One MGM spokesperson likened these requests from Perini to “the director of ‘Ishar’ demanding a sequel.” “Ishtar,’ cost Columbia Pictures $55 million dollars and earned only $4.2 million in its initial run. Perini claims that MGM halted work because of the economy.

    Read the full story…


    Insurance Company Must Show that Lead Came from Building Materials

    August 17, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for Louisiana has reversed the summary judgment of a lower court in the case of Widder v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Company. Judge Roland L. Belsome wrote the opinion for the panel of three judges. Ms. Widder discovered that her home and its content were contaminated by lead. She applied to her insurer, Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance, which denied her claim.

    In response to Ms. Widder’s suit, LCPIC applied for a summary judgment on the grounds that there was no physical loss and that the policy did not cover defective material, latents defects, and pollution damage.

    The appeals court found that the lead contamination of Widder’s home did meet the standards of a direct physical loss, citing a recent Chinese Drywall case. There, it was found, “when a home has been rendered unusable or uninhabitable, physical damage is not necessary.”

    The lower court addressed only one of LCPIC’s exclusions, addressing only the exclusion on basis of “faulty, inadequate or defective material.” The appeals court noted that the evidence offered at trial does not show that the building materials were the source of the lead. This provided the appeals court with a matter of fact to remand to the lower court.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Houses Can Still Make Cents: Illinois’ Implied Warranty of Habitability

    March 1, 2011 — Original Story by Marisa L. Saber Cozen O’Connor Subrogation & Recovery Law Blog

    In a report published earlier this week Marisa L. Saber writes about the implied warranty of habitability in the context of construction defect litigation. The piece speaks of the difficulties in alleging tort theories against builders and vendors in light of Illinois’ expansion of the economic loss doctrine, and how the implied warranty of habitability may provide another avenue for recovery.

    Read Full Story...


    Court Rejects Anti-SLAPP Motion in Construction Defect Suit

    September 1, 2011 — CJD Staff

    The California Court of Appeals has upheld the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion in Claredon American Insurance Company v. Bishop, Barry, Howe, Haney & Ryder. This case was triggered by a water intrusion problem at a condominium complex, the Terraces at Emerystation, built and sold by Wareham Development Corporation. The insurer, Claredon, retained Risk Enterprise Management as the third party claims administrator. REM retained the law firm Bishop, Barry, Howe, Haney & Ryder. The construction defect case was settled in 2007 and the condo owners moved back by early 2008.

    Due to issues with the claims settlement, Claredon filed against REM for “professional negligence, indemnity, apportionment and contribution,” with a cross-complaint that the cross-defendants negligently defended the developer, Wareham.

    In response, the cross-defendants filed a motion to strike the cross-complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute. The trial court denied this motion and now this has been upheld by the appeals court.

    The court noted that “The fundamental thrust of the cross-complaint is not protected litigation-related speech and petitioning activity undertaken on another’s behalf in a judicial proceeding.”

    Read the court’s decision…


    DA’s Office Checking Workers Comp Compliance

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The San Bernardino office of the California District Attorney is partnering with the California Contractor’s State License Board to check if subcontractors are holding the required workers compensation insurance. The High Desert Daily Press reports that the process of checking at sites has been going on for several months.

    Investigators visit sites and ask supervisors to provide a list of subcontractors which the state then checks for compliance. One worker was quoted that insurance inspections were so rare that he had never seen one before, despite 20 years in construction.

    On one day, investigators in two teams visited fourteen construction sites and reviewed the insurance status of twenty-two firms. Three were found out of compliance and stop work orders were issued.

    Read the full story…


    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    December 9, 2011 — Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Although the insureds disclosed flooding problems in the basement, the buyers purchased their home. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. McInerney, 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 1130 (Ill Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2011). In a supplemental disclosure, the insureds reported that during heavy rains light seepage occurred in the basement.

    After moving in, the buyers experienced significant water infiltration and flooding in the basement. The buyers and their children also began to experience mold-related illnesses.

    The buyers sued for rescission of the contract or, in the alternative, damages. They alleged breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation. In the claim for negligent misrepresentation, the buyers alleged that the insureds carelessly omitted the fact that there were material defects in the basement and foundation when they should have known of such defects.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    No Choice between Homeowner Protection and Bankrupt Developers?

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Donna DiMaggio Berger, writing in the Sun Sentinel argues those may be the only current choices in Florida. A recent court case, Lakeview Reserve HOA v. Maronda Homes has caused a swift response from the legislators. Ms. Berger notes that the construction defect bill, HB 1013, “would take away a homeowner’s rights to pursue a developer for defects to the driveways, roads, sidewalks, utilities, drainage areas and other so-called ‘off-site’ improvements.” The alternative? She notes that applying the Maronda decision would “bankrupt developers who don’t build defect-free roads and sidewalks.”

    Read the full story…


    Drug Company Provides Cure for Development Woes

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Vertex Pharmaceuticals is poised to become the holder of Boston’s biggest commercial lease, paying $72.5 million for 1.1 million square feet on Boston’s waterfront. Vertex’s new buildings are still under construction, but the plans have spurred other development in the Fan Pier area, according to the New York Times. The Times quotes Mary A. Burke, a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston that the Vertex project gives “a big push” to the “momentum for economic growth.”

    The Fallon Company is building Vertex’s new laboratory and office space. They are separately planning to build a high-rise with 150 luxury condominium units. According to Joseph Fallon, the chief executive and president of the Fallon Company, there is already a waiting list of 50 buyers for the condominiums.

    Across the street from the Vertex site, a group including Morgan Stanley and Boston Global Investors is planning a 23-block mixed use project that would include 1.2 million square feet of retail space. Additionally, the New England Development and the Hanover Group is building a 356-unit apartment building at the adjacent Pier 4.

    Read the full story…