CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS DIRECTORY
John Sorcinelli ada copliance expert witness, Nevada Construction Expert Witness Directory, New Hampshire Construction Expert Witness Directory, New Jersey Construction Expert Witness Directory, New Mexico Construction Expert Witness Directory, New York Construction Expert Witness Directory, North Carolina Construction Expert Witness Directory, North Dakota Construction Expert Witness Directory, Ohio Construction Expert Witness Directory, Oklahoma Construction Expert Witness Directory, Oregon Construction Expert Witness Directory JOHN SORCINELLI
CONSULTING ARCHITECT

Licensed Architect, State of California

Registered Architect, British Columbia, Canada

Registered Architect, United Kingdom

Registered Architect with NCARB

Member of the American Institute of Architects

Member of the Royal Institute of British Architects

Vice Chairman Royal Institute of British Architects, Los Angeles Chapter

Member of the Architectural Institute of British Columbia

Founder and President of the San Dimas Marketplace, Inc. (non-profit)

Contact John Sorcinelli

Gary Ray ICC Certified Building Inspector, Licensed engineering contractor,Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Directory, Puerto Rico Construction Expert Witness Directory, Rhode Island Construction Expert Witness Directory, South Carolina Construction Expert Witness Directory, South Dakota Construction Expert Witness Directory, Tennessee Construction Expert Witness Directory, Texas Construction Expert Witness Directory , Utah Construction Expert Witness Directory Gary Ray - ICC CERTIFIED
BUILDING INSPECTOR

GENERAL BUILDING &
ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR

LICENSED ELECTRICAL
CONTRACTOR

Master of Business Administration, Major: Construction Management, Alameda University

Licensed General Contractor — B, State of California

Licensed General Contractor — Engineering A, State of California

Licensed Electrical Contractor

International Code Council, Contributing Council Member

International Code Council, Certified International Residential Inspector

American Society of Safety Engineers, Certified Member, Safety Trained Supervisor

4-Year Apprenticeship Program, Journeyman Carpenter (Union 2203)

4-Year Apprenticeship Program, Journeyman Electrician

Contact


Kevin Heidelberger roofing consultant, Vermont Construction Expert Witness Directory , Virginia Construction Expert Witness Directory, Virgin Islands Construction Expert Witness Directory, Washington Construction Expert Witness Directory, West Virginia Construction Expert Witness Directory, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Directory,Wyoming Construction Expert Witness Directory KEVIN HEIDELBERGER
ROOFING & WATERPROOFING CONSULTANT

Licensed Roofing Contractor, C39-539648, State of California

Licensed Roofing Contractor (C15A), State of Nevada

Certified Waterproofing Applicator

Instructor — Tile Roof Institute

Member, Tile Roof Institute

Member, Western States Roofing Contractors Association (WSRCA)

Certified Installer — Tile Roof Institute

Certified Specifier Tile Roof Institute

Carlisle Waterproofing — Certified Inspector

Contact

Bradley W. Hughes BRADLEY W. HUGHES
ROOFING CONSULTANT

Licensed General Building Contractor, B-00723912, State of California

Licensed Roofing Contractor, C39-00723912, State of California

Graduate, Control Data Institute, Anaheim, CA

Associate of Science Equivalence Diploma computer technology

Member, Construction Specifications Institute

Tile Roofing Institute Certification

Contact


Alan D. Sturm ALAN D. STURM
CONSULTING GENERAL
BUILDING CONTRACTOR

Experienced in residential, commercial and catastrophic property claims with certifications from National Flood Insurance Program
 (NFIP), California Earthquake Authority (CEA), State Farm, Allstate, Tower Hill, Liberty Mutual, St. Paul/Travelers  Licensed Insurance Adjuster in Five States

Contact


Paul Viau PAUL S. VIAU - CONSULTING GENERAL
BUILDING CONTRACTOR

ICC CERTIFIED BUILDING
INSPECTOR

Licensed General Building Contractor — B, State of California

Licensed General Contractor — KB-02, State of Arizona
ICC Certified Building Inspector

IICRC Certified Water Restoration Technician
Applied Microbial Remediation Technician

Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Member, International Code Council

Contact


Brian Vann BRIAN VANN - CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS
SPECIALIST

Licensed Contractor, New Mexico

Bachelor of Arts Degree, Architecture, University of California, Berkeley

IICRC-Certified Water Restoration Technician

Applied Microbial Remediation Technician

Instructor, Santa Fe Community College, Santa Fe, New Mexico

Instructor, University of Colorado Center
Certified Estimator, Xactimate

Contact

David Suggs DAVID L. SUGGS
LICENSED GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR

CONSTRUCTION COST
EXPERT

Licensed General Building Contractor, B-778968, State of California

Certified Waterproofing Applicator

Member, American Society of Professional Estimators

Member, Construction Specifications Institute

Contact

Jack J. Taylor JACK J. TAYLOR
COST ESTIMATING
SPECIALIST

Licensed General Contractor, State of California

Licensed Concrete Contractor, State of California

Certificate of Graduation in Construction Cost Estimating CMI

Carpenter’s Apprenticeship Program - San Bernardino Valley College

Member American Society of Professional Estimators

Certified Waterproofing Applicator

Certificate-IICRC & AGGIH Mold Remediation in Buildings

Contact

Gregory C. Cook GREGORY C. COOK
CERTIFIED MOLD REMEDIATION CONTRACTOR

Licensed General Contractor, California

ICBO Residential Building Inspector

Certified Mold Remediation Contractor

Contact

Anthony R. Montosa ANTHONY R. MONTOSA
CONSULTING PLUMBING &
GENERAL BUILDING
CONTRACTOR

Licensed General Building Contractor, State of California

Licensed Plumbing Contractor, State of California (C-36)

Graduate, Foothill College

Member, Plumber’s Union Local 393

Contact


Jorge Porter GEORGE PORTER
CONSULTING ARCHITECT

MASTER BUILDING INSPECTOR

ADA COMPLIANCE EXPERT

Licensed Architect, California

Licensed Architect, Mexico

Bachelor in Architecture, Escuela Mexicana de Arquitectura, La Salle University, Mexico City, Mexico

Contact Jorge Porter


CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS DIRECTORY

California Construction Expert Witness Directory


Find Credentialed Construction and Design Professionals with the collective experience gained through more than 4000 construction defect and claims related litigations.  The Construction Expert Witness and Consulting Group provides expert opinion, analysis and construction related consulting services to the nations most recognized law firms, Fortune 500 Builders, commercial general liability carriers, building product manufacturers, owners, property management firms, public companies, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. Contact us today to arrange for an initial consultation regarding your matter.
ADA Compliance Expert Witness Brian G. Moffitt
consulting architect

Licensed Architect, Nevada
Licensed Architect, Arizona
Licensed Architect, Texas
Master of Architecture, University of Utah
Bachelor of Science, University of Utah
Member, American Institute of Architects
Member, Construction Specifications Institute


Contact
Construction Expert Witness Windows, Fenestrations Expert Witness Windows Certification Expert Witness Window Leak Testing Expert Witness Building Envelope Expert Witness Concrete – Sulphates Expert Witness Builders Right To Repair Expert Witness Entitlement Planning Expert Witness Construction Change Order Analysis Expert WitnessNevada Chapter 40 Expert Witness California SB 800 Compliance Expert Witness John D. Tolman
construction consultant

Licensed General Building Contractor, B-410125, State of California
Licensed Real Estate Broker — California
Doctorate of Law — Western State University
Bachelor of Science, Law — Western State University
Bachelor of Arts — University of Redlands
Member — American Bar Association
Member — Building Industry Association
Member — American Society of Professional Estimators
Member — Construction Specification Institute
Member — Association of General Contractors


Contact
 Consulting Civil Engineer Construction Safety OSHA Expert Witness Construction Site Accidents Expert Witness Disabled Access Expert Witness Doors – Finish Carpentry Expert Witness Electrical Engineering Expert Witness Electrical Contracting – Standard of Care Expert Witness Fire Sprinklers Expert Witness Fire Loss Evaluation Expert Witness Flood Loss Recovery Estimating Expert Witness Geotechnical Engineering Expert Witness Glazing Expert Witness Hydrology & Groundwater Expert Witness Mark E. Rieser II - ms,pe
consulting civil engineer
engineering contractor
general building contractor

Masters Degree in Civil Engineering, San Jose State University
Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering, San Jose State University
Registered Civil Engineer, State of California
Licensed General Engineering Contractor, A-00815841, State of California
Licensed General Building Contractor, B-00815841, State of California
Member, American Society of Civil Engineers
Member, Association of General Contractors

Contact

CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL 800 TEXT AND RESOURCES

 

Senate Bill No. 800

CHAPTER 722

An act to add Section 43.99 to, and to add Title 7 (commencing with Section 895) to Part 2 of Division 2 of, the Civil Code, relating to construction defects.

[Approved by Governor September 20, 2002. Filed with Secretary of State September 20, 2002.]

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SB 800, Burton. Liability: construction defects.

Existing law provides for stipulated judgments in construction defect actions, as defined.

The bill would specify the rights and requirements of a homeowner to bring an action for construction defects, including applicable standards for home construction, the statute of limitations, the burden of proof, the damages recoverable, a detailed prelitigation procedure, and the obligations of the homeowner.

This bill would also provide that there is no personal monetary liability on the part of, and no cause of action for damages shall arise against, any person, in any of the specified categories, who is under contract with an applicant for a residential building permit to provide independent quality review of the plans and specifications provided with the application in order to determine compliance with all applicable requirements imposed pursuant to the State Housing Law or any rules or regulations adopted pursuant to that law, or to inspect a work of improvement to determine compliance with these plans and specifications, except as specified. The bill would also set forth specified findings and declarations of the Legislature regarding construction defects.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares, as follows:

(a)
The California system for the administration of civil justice is one of the fairest in the world, but certain procedures and standards should be amended to ensure fairness to all parties.
(b)
The prompt and fair resolution of construction defect claims is in the interest of consumers, homeowners, and the builders of homes, and is vital to the state’s continuing growth and vitality. However, under current procedures and standards, homeowners and builders alike are not afforded the opportunity for quick and fair resolution of claims. Both need clear standards and mechanisms for the prompt resolution of claims.
(c)
It is the intent of the Legislature that this act improve the procedures for the administration of civil justice, including standards and procedures for early disposition of construction defects.

SEC. 2. Section 43.99 is added to the Civil Code, to read:

43.99. (a) There shall be no monetary liability on the part of, and no cause of action for damages shall arise against, any person or other legal entity that is under contract with an applicant for a residential building permit to provide independent quality review of the plans and specifications provided with the application in order to determine compliance with all applicable requirements imposed pursuant to the State Housing Law (Part 1.5 (commencing with Section 17910) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code), or any rules or regulations adopted pursuant to that law, or under contract with that applicant to provide independent quality review of the work of improvement to determine compliance with these plans and specifications, if the person or other legal entity meets the requirements of this section and one of the following applies:

(1)
The person, or a person employed by any other legal entity, performing the work as described in this subdivision, has completed not less than five years of verifiable experience in the appropriate field and has obtained certification as a building inspector, combination inspector, or combination dwelling inspector from the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and has successfully passed the technical written examination promulgated by ICBO for those certification categories.
(2)
The person, or a person employed by any other legal entity, performing the work as described in this subdivision, has completed not less than five years of verifiable experience in the appropriate field and is a registered professional engineer, licensed general contractor, or a licensed architect rendering independent quality review of the work of improvement or plan examination services within the scope of his or her registration or licensure.
(3)
The immunity provided under this section does not apply to any action initiated by the applicant who retained the qualified person.
(4)
A ‘‘qualified person’’ for purposes of this section means a person holding a valid certification as one of those inspectors.
(b)
Except for qualified persons, this section shall not relieve from, excuse, or lessen in any manner, the responsibility or liability of any person, company, contractor, builder, developer, architect, engineer, designer, or other individual or entity who develops, improves, owns, operates, or manages any residential building for any damages to persons or property caused by construction or design defects. The fact that an inspection by a qualified person has taken place may not be introduced as evidence in a construction defect action, including any reports or other items generated by the qualified person. This subdivision shall not apply in any action initiated by the applicant who retained the qualified person.
(c)
Nothing in this section, as it relates to construction inspectors or plans examiners, shall be construed to alter the requirements for licensure, or the jurisdiction, authority, or scope of practice, of architects pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 5500) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, professional engineers pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 6700) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, or general contractors pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code.
(d)
Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter the immunity of employees of the Department of Housing and Community Development under the Tort Claims Act (Division 3.6 (commencing with Section 810) of Title 1 of the Government Code) when acting pursuant to Section 17965 of the Health and Safety Code.
(e)
The qualifying person shall engage in no other construction, design, planning, supervision, or activities of any kind on the work of improvement, nor provide quality review services for any other party on the work of improvement.
(f)
The qualifying person, or other legal entity, shall maintain professional errors and omissions insurance coverage in an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000).
(g)
The immunity provided by subdivision (a) does not inure to the benefit of the qualified person for damages caused to the applicant solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of the qualified person resulting from the provision of services under the contract with the applicant.

SEC. 3. Title 7 (commencing with Section 895) is added to Part 2 of Division 2 of the Civil Code, to read:

TITLE 7. REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTIONS FOR
CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS

CHAPTER 1. DEFINITIONS

895. (a) ‘‘Structure’’ means any residential dwelling, other building, or improvement located upon a lot or within a common area.

(b)
‘‘Designed moisture barrier’’ means an installed moisture barrier specified in the plans and specifications, contract documents, or manufacturer’s recommendations.
(c)
‘‘Actual moisture barrier’’ means any component or material, actually installed, that serves to any degree as a barrier against moisture, whether or not intended as such.
(d)
‘‘Unintended water’’ means water that passes beyond, around, or through a component or the material that is designed to prevent that passage.
(e)
‘‘Close of escrow’’ means the date of the close of escrow between the builder and the original homeowner. With respect to claims by an association, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 1351, ‘‘close of escrow’’ means the date of substantial completion, as defined in Section

337.15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or the date the builder relinquishes control over the association’s ability to decide whether to initiate a claim under this title, whichever is later.

(f) ‘‘Claimant’’ or ‘‘homeowner’’ includes the individual owners of single-family homes, individual unit owners of attached dwellings and, in the case of a common interest development, any association as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 1351.

CHAPTER 2. ACTIONABLE DEFECTS

896. In any action seeking recovery of damages arising out of, or related to deficiencies in, the residential construction, design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction, a builder, and to the extent set forth in Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 910), a subcontractor, material supplier, individual product manufacturer, or design professional, shall, except as specifically set forth in this title, be liable for, and the claimant’s claims or causes of action shall be limited to violation of, the following standards, except as specifically set forth in this title. This title applies to original construction intended to be sold as an individual dwelling unit. As to condominium conversions, this title does not apply to or does not supersede any other statutory or common law.

(a) With respect to water issues:

(1)
A door shall not allow unintended water to pass beyond, around, or through the door or its designed or actual moisture barriers, if any.
(2)
Windows, patio doors, deck doors, and their systems shall not allow water to pass beyond, around, or through the window, patio door, or deck door or its designed or actual moisture barriers, including, without limitation, internal barriers within the systems themselves. For purposes of this paragraph, ‘‘systems’’ include, without limitation, windows, window assemblies, framing, substrate, flashings, and trim, if any.
(3)
Windows, patio doors, deck doors, and their systems shall not allow excessive condensation to enter the structure and cause damage to another component. For purposes of this paragraph, ‘‘systems’’ include, without limitation, windows, window assemblies, framing, substrate, flashings, and trim, if any.
(4)
Roofs, roofing systems, chimney caps, and ventilation components shall not allow water to enter the structure or to pass beyond, around, or through the designed or actual moisture barriers, including, without limitation, internal barriers located within the systems themselves. For purposes of this paragraph, ‘‘systems’’ include, without limitation, framing, substrate, and sheathing, if any.
(5)
Decks, deck systems, balconies, balcony systems, exterior stairs, and stair systems shall not allow water to pass into the adjacent structure. For purposes of this paragraph, ‘‘systems’’ include, without limitation, framing, substrate, flashing, and sheathing, if any.
(6)
Decks, deck systems, balconies, balcony systems, exterior stairs, and stair systems shall not allow unintended water to pass within the systems themselves and cause damage to the systems. For purposes of this paragraph, ‘‘systems’’ include, without limitation, framing, substrate, flashing, and sheathing, if any.
(7)
Foundation systems and slabs shall not allow water or vapor to enter into the structure so as to cause damage to another building component.
(8)
Foundation systems and slabs shall not allow water or vapor to enter into the structure so as to limit the installation of the type of flooring materials typically used for the particular application.
(9)
Hardscape, including paths and patios, irrigation systems, landscaping systems, and drainage systems, that are installed as part of the original construction, shall not be installed in such a way as to cause water or soil erosion to enter into or come in contact with the structure so as to cause damage to another building component.
(10)
Stucco, exterior siding, exterior walls, including, without limitation, exterior framing, and other exterior wall finishes and fixtures and the systems of those components and fixtures, including, but not limited to, pot shelves, horizontal surfaces, columns, and plant-ons, shall be installed in such a way so as not to allow unintended water to pass into the structure or to pass beyond, around, or through the designed or actual moisture barriers of the system, including any internal barriers located within the system itself. For purposes of this paragraph, ‘‘systems’’ include, without limitation, framing, substrate, flashings, trim, wall assemblies, and internal wall cavities, if any.
(11)
Stucco, exterior siding, and exterior walls shall not allow excessive condensation to enter the structure and cause damage to another component. For purposes of this paragraph, ‘‘systems’’ include, without limitation, framing, substrate, flashings, trim, wall assemblies, and internal wall cavities, if any.
(12)
Retaining and site walls and their associated drainage systems shall not allow unintended water to pass beyond, around, or through its designed or actual moisture barriers including, without limitation, any internal barriers, so as to cause damage. This standard does not apply to those portions of any wall or drainage system that are designed to have water flow beyond, around, or through them.
(13)
Retaining walls and site walls, and their associated drainage systems, shall only allow water to flow beyond, around, or through the areas designated by design.
(14)
The lines and components of the plumbing system, sewer system, and utility systems shall not leak.
(15)
Plumbing lines, sewer lines, and utility lines shall not corrode so as to impede the useful life of the systems.
(16)
Sewer systems shall be installed in such a way as to allow the designated amount of sewage to flow through the system.
(17)
Shower and bath enclosures shall not leak water into the interior of walls, flooring systems, or the interior of other components.
(18)
Ceramic tile and tile countertops shall not allow water into the interior of walls, flooring systems, or other components so as to cause damage. (b) With respect to structural issues:
(1)
Foundations, load bearing components, and slabs, shall not contain significant cracks or significant vertical displacement.
(2)
Foundations, load bearing components, and slabs shall not cause the structure, in whole or in part, to be structurally unsafe.
(3)
Foundations, load bearing components, and slabs, and underlying soils shall be constructed so as to materially comply with the design criteria set by applicable government building codes, regulations, and ordinances for chemical deterioration or corrosion resistance in effect at the time of original construction.
(4)
A structure shall be constructed so as to materially comply with the design criteria for earthquake and wind load resistance, as set forth in the applicable government building codes, regulations, and ordinances in effect at the time of original construction. (c) With respect to soil issues:
(1)
Soils and engineered retaining walls shall not cause, in whole or in part, damage to the structure built upon the soil or engineered retaining wall.
(2)
Soils and engineered retaining walls shall not cause, in whole or in part, the structure to be structurally unsafe.
(3)
Soils shall not cause, in whole or in part, the land upon which no structure is built to become unusable for the purpose represented at the time of original sale by the builder or for the purpose for which that land is commonly used. (d) With respect to fire protection issues:
(1)
A structure shall be constructed so as to materially comply with the design criteria of the applicable government building codes, regulations, and ordinances for fire protection of the occupants in effect at the time of the original construction.
(2)
Fireplaces, chimneys, chimney structures, and chimney termination caps shall be constructed and installed in such a way so as not to cause an unreasonable risk of fire outside the fireplace enclosure or chimney.
(3)
Electrical and mechanical systems shall be constructed and installed in such a way so as not to cause an unreasonable risk of fire.

(e) With respect to plumbing and sewer issues:

Plumbing and sewer systems shall be installed to operate properly and shall not materially impair the use of the structure by its inhabitants. However, no action may be brought for a violation of this subdivision more than four years after close of escrow.

(f) With respect to electrical system issues:

Electrical systems shall operate properly and shall not materially impair the use of the structure by its inhabitants. However, no action shall be brought pursuant to this subdivision more than four years from close of escrow.

(g) With respect to issues regarding other areas of construction:

(1)
Exterior pathways, driveways, hardscape, sidewalls, sidewalks, and patios installed by the original builder shall not contain cracks that display significant vertical displacement or that are excessive. However, no action shall be brought upon a violation of this paragraph more than four years from close of escrow.
(2)
Stucco, exterior siding, and other exterior wall finishes and fixtures, including, but not limited to, pot shelves, horizontal surfaces, columns, and plant-ons, shall not contain significant cracks or separations.
(3)
(A) To the extent not otherwise covered by these standards, manufactured products, including, but not limited to, windows, doors, roofs, plumbing products and fixtures, fireplaces, electrical fixtures, HVAC units, countertops, cabinets, paint, and appliances shall be installed so as not to interfere with the products’ useful life, if any.
(B)
For purposes of this paragraph, ‘‘useful life’’ means a representation of how long a product is warranted or represented, through its limited warranty or any written representations, to last by its manufacturer, including recommended or required maintenance. If there is no representation by a manufacturer, a builder shall install manufactured products so as not to interfere with the product’s utility.
(C)
For purposes of this paragraph, ‘‘manufactured product’’ means a product that is completely manufactured offsite.
(D)
If no useful life representation is made, or if the representation is less than one year, the period shall be no less than one year. If a manufactured product is damaged as a result of a violation of these standards, damage to the product is a recoverable element of damages. This subparagraph does not limit recovery if there has been damage to another building component caused by a manufactured product during the manufactured product’s useful life.
(E)
This title does not apply in any action seeking recovery solely for a defect in a manufactured product located within or adjacent to a structure.
(4)
Heating, if any, shall be installed so as to be capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit at a point three feet above the floor in any living space.
(5)
Living space air-conditioning, if any, shall be provided in a manner consistent with the size and efficiency design criteria specified in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations or its successor.
(6)
Attached structures shall be constructed to comply with interunit noise transmission standards set by the applicable government building codes, ordinances, or regulations in effect at the time of the original construction. If there is no applicable code, ordinance, or regulation, this paragraph does not apply. However, no action shall be brought pursuant to this paragraph more than one year from the original occupancy of the adjacent unit.
(7)
Irrigation systems and drainage shall operate properly so as not to damage landscaping or other external improvements. However, no action shall be brought pursuant to this paragraph more than one year from close of escrow.
(8)
Untreated wood posts shall not be installed in contact with soil so as to cause unreasonable decay to the wood based upon the finish grade at the time of original construction. However, no action shall be brought pursuant to this paragraph more than two years from close of escrow.
(9)
Untreated steel fences and adjacent components shall be installed so as to prevent unreasonable corrosion. However, no action shall be brought pursuant to this paragraph more than four years from close of escrow.
(10)
Paint and stains shall be applied in such a manner so as not to cause deterioration of the building surfaces for the length of time specified by the paint or stain manufacturers’ representations, if any. However, no action shall be brought pursuant to this paragraph more than five years from close of escrow.
(11)
Roofing materials shall be installed so as to avoid materials falling from the roof.
(12)
The landscaping systems shall be installed in such a manner so as to survive for not less than one year. However, no action shall be brought pursuant to this paragraph more than two years from close of escrow.
(13)
Ceramic tile and tile backing shall be installed in such a manner that the tile does not detach.
(14)
Dryer ducts shall be installed and terminated pursuant to manufacturer installation requirements. However, no action shall be brought pursuant to this paragraph more than two years from close of escrow.
(15)
Structures shall be constructed in such a manner so as not to impair the occupants’ safety because they contain public health hazards as determined by a duly authorized public health official, health agency, or governmental entity having jurisdiction. This paragraph does not limit recovery for any damages caused by a violation of any other paragraph of this section on the grounds that the damages do not constitute a health hazard.

897. The standards set forth in this chapter are intended to address every function or component of a structure. To the extent that a function or component of a structure is not addressed by these standards, it shall be actionable if it causes damage.

CHAPTER 3. OBLIGATIONS

  1. As to fit and finish items, a builder shall provide a homebuyer with a minimum one-year express written limited warranty covering the fit and finish of the following building components. Except as otherwise provided by the standards specified in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896), this warranty shall cover the fit and finish of cabinets, mirrors, flooring, interior and exterior walls, countertops, paint finishes, and trim, but shall not apply to damage to those components caused by defects in other components governed by the other provisions of this title. Any fit and finish matters covered by this warranty are not subject to the provisions of this title. If a builder fails to provide the express warranty required by this section, the warranty for these items shall be for a period of one year.
  2. A builder may, but is not required to, offer greater protection or protection for longer time periods in its express contract with the homeowner than that set forth in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896). A builder may not limit the application of Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896) or lower its protection through the express contract with the homeowner. This type of express contract constitutes an ‘‘enhanced protection agreement.’’
  3. If a builder offers an enhanced protection agreement, the builder may choose to be subject to its own express contractual provisions in place of the provisions set forth in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896). If an enhanced protection agreement is in place, Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896) no longer applies other than to set forth minimum provisions by which to judge the enforceability of the particular provisions of the enhanced protection agreement.
  4. If a builder offers an enhanced protection agreement in place of the provisions set forth in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896), the election to do so shall be made in writing with the homeowner no later than the close of escrow. The builder shall provide the homeowner with a complete copy of Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896) and advise the homeowner that the builder has elected not to be subject to its provisions. If any provision of an enhanced protection agreement is later found to be unenforceable as not meeting the minimum standards of Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896), a builder may use this chapter in lieu of those provisions found to be unenforceable.
  5. If a builder has elected to use an enhanced protection agreement, and a homeowner disputes that the particular provision or time periods of the enhanced protection agreement are not greater than, or equal to, the provisions of Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896) as they apply to the particular deficiency alleged by the homeowner, the homeowner may seek to enforce the application of the standards set forth in this chapter as to those claimed deficiencies. If a homeowner seeks to enforce a particular standard in lieu of a provision of the enhanced protection agreement, the homeowner shall give the builder written notice of that intent at the time the homeowner files a notice of claim pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 910).
    1. If a homeowner seeks to enforce Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896), in lieu of the enhanced protection agreement in a subsequent litigation or other legal action, the builder shall have the right to have the matter bifurcated, and to have an immediately binding determination of his or her responsive pleading within 60 days after the filing of that pleading, but in no event after the commencement of discovery, as to the application of either Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896) or the enhanced protection agreement as to the deficiencies
    2. claimed by the homeowner. If the builder fails to seek that determination in the timeframe specified, the builder waives the right to do so and the standards set forth in this title shall apply. As to any nonoriginal homeowner, that homeowner shall be deemed in privity for purposes of an enhanced protection agreement only to the extent that the builder has recorded the enhanced protection agreement on title or provided actual notice to the nonoriginal homeowner of the enhanced protection agreement. If the enhanced protection agreement is not recorded on title or no actual notice has been provided, the standards set forth in this title apply to any nonoriginal homeowners’ claims.
  6. A builder’s election to use an enhanced protection agreement addresses only the issues set forth in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896) and does not constitute an election to use or not use the provisions of Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 910). The decision to use or not use Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 910) is governed by the provisions of that chapter.
  7. A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses contained in Section 944.

CHAPTER 4. PRELITIGATION PROCEDURE

910. Prior to filing an action against any party alleged to have contributed to a violation of the standards set forth in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896), the claimant shall initiate the following prelitigation procedures:

(a)
The claimant or his or her legal representative shall provide written notice via certified mail, overnight mail, or personal delivery to the builder, in the manner prescribed in this section, of the claimant’s claim that the construction of his or her residence violates any of the standards set forth in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896). That notice shall provide the claimant’s name, address, and preferred method of contact, and shall state that the claimant alleges a violation pursuant to this part against the builder, and shall describe the claim in reasonable detail sufficient to determine the nature and location, to the extent known, of the claimed violation. In the case of a group of homeowners or an association, the notice may identify the claimants solely by address or other description sufficient to apprise the builder of the locations of the subject residences. That document shall have the same force and effect as a notice of commencement of a legal proceeding.
(b)
The notice requirements of this section do not preclude a homeowner from seeking redress through any applicable normal customer service procedure as set forth in any contractual, warranty, or other builder-generated document; and, if a homeowner seeks to do so, that request shall not satisfy the notice requirements of this section.

911. For purposes of this title, ‘‘builder’’ means a builder, developer, or original seller and applies to the sale of new residential units on and after January 1, 2003.

912. A builder shall do all of the following:

(a)
Within 30 days of a written request by a homeowner or his or her legal representative, the builder shall provide copies of all relevant plans, specifications, mass or rough grading plans, final soils reports, Department of Real Estate public reports, and available engineering calculations, that pertain to a homeowner’s residence specifically or as part of a larger development tract. The request shall be honored if it states that it is made relative to structural, fire safety, or soils provisions of this title. However, a builder is not obligated to provide a copying service, and reasonable copying costs shall be borne by the requesting party. A builder may require that the documents be copied onsite by the requesting party, except that the homeowner may, at his or her option, use his or her own copying service, which may include an offsite copy facility that is bonded and insured. If a builder can show that the builder maintained the documents, but that they later became unavailable due to loss or destruction that was not the fault of the builder, the builder may be excused from the requirements of this subdivision, in which case the builder shall act with reasonable diligence to assist the homeowner in obtaining those documents from any applicable government authority or from the source that generated the document. However, in that case, the time limits specified by this section do not apply.
(b)
At the expense of the homeowner, who may opt to use an offsite copy facility that is bonded and insured, the builder shall provide to the homeowner or his or her legal representative copies of all maintenance and preventative maintenance recommendations that pertain to his or her residence within 30 days of service of a written request for those documents. Those documents shall also be provided to the homeowner in conjunction with the initial sale of the residence.
(c)
At the expense of the homeowner, who may opt to use an offsite copy facility that is bonded and insured, a builder shall provide to the homeowner or his or her legal representative copies of all manufactured products maintenance, preventive maintenance, and limited warranty information within 30 days of a written request for those documents. These documents shall also be provided to the homeowner in conjunction with the initial sale of the residence.
(d)
At the expense of the homeowner, who may opt to use an offsite copy facility that is bonded and insured, a builder shall provide to the homeowner or his or her legal representative copies of all of the builder’s limited contractual warranties in accordance with this part in effect at the time of the original sale of the residence within 30 days of a written request for those documents. Those documents shall also be provided to the homeowner in conjunction with the initial sale of the residence.
(e)
A builder shall maintain the name and address of an agent for notice pursuant to this chapter with the Secretary of State or, alternatively, elect to use a third party for that notice if the builder has notified the homeowner in writing of the third party’s name and address, to whom claims and requests for information under this section may be mailed. The name and address of the agent for notice or third party shall be included with the original sales documentation and shall be initialed and acknowledged by the purchaser and the builder’s sales representative. This subdivision applies to instances in which a builder contracts with a third party to accept claims and act on the builder’s behalf. A builder shall give actual notice to the homeowner that the builder has made such an election, and shall include the name and address of the third party.
(f)
A builder shall record on title a notice of the existence of these procedures and a notice that these procedures impact the legal rights of the homeowner. This information shall also be included with the original sales documentation and shall be initialed and acknowledged by the purchaser and the builder’s sales representative.
(g)
A builder shall provide with the original sales documentation, a written copy of this part which shall be initialed and acknowledged by the purchaser and the builder’s sales representative.
(h)
As to any documents provided in conjunction with the original sale, the builder shall instruct the original purchaser to provide those documents to any subsequent purchaser.
(i)
Any builder who fails to comply with any of these requirements within the time specified is not entitled to the protection of this chapter, and the homeowner is released from the requirements of this chapter and may proceed with the filing of an action, in which case the remaining chapters of this part shall continue to apply to the action.
    1. A builder or his or her representative shall acknowledge, in writing, receipt of the notice of the claim within 14 days after receipt of the notice of the claim. If the notice of the claim is served by the claimant’s legal representative, or if the builder receives a written representation letter from a homeowner’s attorney, the builder shall include the attorney in all subsequent substantive communications, including, without limitation, all written communications occurring
    2. pursuant to this chapter, and all substantive and procedural communications, including all written communications, following the commencement of any subsequent complaint or other legal action, except that if the builder has retained or involved legal counsel to assist the builder in this process, all communications by the builder’s counsel shall only be with the claimant’s legal representative, if any.
  1. (a) This chapter establishes a nonadversarial procedure, including the remedies available under this chapter which, if the procedure does not resolve the dispute between the parties, may result in a subsequent action to enforce the other chapters of this title. A builder may attempt to commence nonadversarial contractual provisions other than the nonadversarial procedures and remedies set forth in this chapter, but may not, in addition to its own nonadversarial contractual provisions, require adherence to the nonadversarial procedures and remedies set forth in this chapter, regardless of whether the builder’s own alternative nonadversarial contractual provisions are successful in resolving the dispute or ultimately deemed enforceable.

At the time the sales agreement is executed, the builder shall notify the homeowner whether the builder intends to engage in the nonadversarial procedure of this section or attempt to enforce alternative nonadversarial contractual provisions. If the builder elects to use alternative nonadversarial contractual provisions in lieu of this chapter, the election is binding, regardless of whether the builder’s alternative nonadversarial contractual provisions are successful in resolving the ultimate dispute or are ultimately deemed enforceable.

(b) Nothing in this title is intended to affect existing statutory or decisional law pertaining to the applicability, viability, or enforceability of alternative dispute resolution methods, alternative remedies, or contractual arbitration, judicial reference, or similar procedures requiring a binding resolution to enforce the other chapters of this title or any other disputes between homeowners and builders. Nothing in this title is intended to affect the applicability, viability, or enforceability, if any, of contractual arbitration or judicial reference after a nonadversarial procedure or provision has been completed.

  1. If a builder fails to acknowledge receipt of the notice of a claim within the time specified, elects not to go through the process set forth in this chapter, or fails to request an inspection within the time specified, or at the conclusion or cessation of an alternative nonadversarial proceeding, this chapter does not apply and the homeowner is released from the requirements of this chapter and may proceed with the filing of an action. However, the standards set forth in the other chapters of this title shall continue to apply to the action.
  2. (a) If a builder elects to inspect the claimed unmet standards, the builder shall complete the initial inspection and testing within 14 days after acknowledgment of receipt of the notice of the claim, at a mutually convenient date and time. If the homeowner has retained legal representation, the inspection shall be scheduled with the legal representative’s office at a mutually convenient date and time, unless the legal representative is unavailable during the relevant time periods. All costs of builder inspection and testing, including any damage caused by the builder inspection, shall be borne by the builder. The builder shall also provide written proof that the builder has liability insurance to cover any damages or injuries occurring during inspection and testing. The builder shall restore the property to its pretesting condition within 48 hours of the testing. The builder shall, upon request, allow the inspections to be observed and electronically recorded, videotaped, or photographed by the claimant or his or her legal representative.
(b)
Nothing that occurs during a builder’s or claimant’s inspection or testing may be used or introduced as evidence to support a spoilation defense by any potential party in any subsequent litigation.
(c)
If a builder deems a second inspection or testing reasonably necessary, and specifies the reasons therefor in writing within three days following the initial inspection, the builder may conduct a second inspection or testing. A second inspection or testing shall be completed within 40 days of the initial inspection or testing. All requirements concerning the initial inspection or testing shall also apply to the second inspection or testing.
(d)
If the builder fails to inspect or test the property within the time specified, the claimant is released from the requirements of this section and may proceed with the filing of an action. However, the standards set forth in the other chapters of this title shall continue to apply to the action.
(e)
If a builder intends to hold a subcontractor, design professional, individual product manufacturer, or material supplier, including an insurance carrier, warranty company, or service company, responsible for its contribution to the unmet standard, the builder shall provide notice to that person or entity sufficiently in advance to allow them to attend the initial, or if requested, second inspection of any alleged unmet standard and to participate in the repair process. The claimant and his or her legal representative, if any, shall be advised in a reasonable time prior to the inspection as to the identity of all persons or entities invited to attend. This subdivision shall not apply to the builder’s insurance company. Except with respect to any claims involving a repair actually conducted under this chapter, nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to relieve a subcontractor, design professional, individual

product manufacturer, or material supplier of any liability under an action brought by a claimant.

  1. Within 30 days of the initial or, if requested, second inspection or testing, the builder may offer in writing to repair the violation. The offer to repair shall also compensate the homeowner for all applicable damages recoverable under Section 944, within the timeframe for the repair set forth in this chapter. Any such offer shall be accompanied by a detailed, specific, step-by-step statement identifying the particular violation that is being repaired, explaining the nature, scope, and location of the repair, and setting a reasonable completion date for the repair. The offer shall also include the names, addresses, telephone numbers, and license numbers of the contractors whom the builder intends to have perform the repair. Those contractors shall be fully insured for, and shall be responsible for, all damages or injuries that they may cause to occur during the repair, and evidence of that insurance shall be provided to the homeowner upon request. Upon written request by the homeowner or his or her legal representative, and within the timeframes set forth in this chapter, the builder shall also provide any available technical documentation, including, without limitation, plans and specifications, pertaining to the claimed violation within the particular home or development tract. The offer shall also advise the homeowner in writing of his or her right to request up to three additional contractors from which to select to do the repair pursuant to this chapter.
  2. Upon receipt of the offer to repair, the homeowner shall have 30 days to authorize the builder to proceed with the repair. The homeowner may alternatively request, at the homeowner’s sole option and discretion, that the builder provide the names, addresses, telephone numbers, and license numbers for up to three alternative contractors who are not owned or financially controlled by the builder and who regularly conduct business in the county where the structure is located. If the homeowner so elects, the builder is entitled to an additional noninvasive inspection, to occur at a mutually convenient date and time within 20 days of the election, so as to permit the other proposed contractors to review the proposed site of the repair. Within 35 days after the request of the homeowner for alternative contractors, the builder shall present the homeowner with a choice of contractors. Within 20 days after that presentation, the homeowner shall authorize the builder or one of the alternative contractors to perform the repair.
    1. The offer to repair shall also be accompanied by an offer to mediate the dispute if the homeowner so chooses. The mediation shall be limited to a four-hour mediation, except as otherwise mutually agreed before a nonaffiliated mediator selected and paid for by the builder. At the homeowner’s sole option, the homeowner may agree to split the cost
    2. of the mediator, and if he or she does so, the mediator shall be selected jointly. The mediator shall have sufficient availability such that the mediation occurs within 15 days after the request to mediate is received and occurs at a mutually convenient location within the county where the action is pending. If a builder has made an offer to repair a violation, and the mediation has failed to resolve the dispute, the homeowner shall allow the repair to be performed either by the builder, its contractor, or the selected contractor.
  3. If the builder fails to make an offer to repair or otherwise strictly comply with this chapter within the times specified, the claimant is released from the requirements of this chapter and may proceed with the filing of an action. If the contractor performing the repair does not complete the repair in the time or manner specified, the claimant may file an action. If this occurs, the standards set forth in the other chapters of this part shall continue to apply to the action.
  4. (a) In the event that a resolution under this chapter involves a repair by the builder, the builder shall make an appointment with the claimant, make all appropriate arrangements to effectuate a repair of the claimed unmet standards, and compensate the homeowner for all damages resulting therefrom free of charge to the claimant. The repair shall be scheduled through the claimant’s legal representative, if any, unless he or she is unavailable during the relevant time periods. The repair shall be commenced on a mutually convenient date within 14 days of acceptance or, if an alternative contractor is selected by the homeowner, within 14 days of the selection, or, if a mediation occurs, within seven days of the mediation, or within five days after a permit is obtained if one is required. The builder shall act with reasonable diligence in obtaining any such permit.

(b) The builder shall ensure that work done on the repairs is done with the utmost diligence, and that the repairs are completed as soon as reasonably possible, subject to the nature of the repair or some unforeseen event not caused by the builder or the contractor performing the repair. Every effort shall be made to complete the repair within 120 days.

  1. The builder shall, upon request, allow the repair to be observed and electronically recorded, videotaped, or photographed by the claimant or his or her legal representative. Nothing that occurs during the repair process may be used or introduced as evidence to support a spoliation defense by any potential party in any subsequent litigation.
  2. The builder shall provide the homeowner or his or her legal representative, upon request, with copies of all correspondence, photographs, and other materials pertaining or relating in any manner to the repairs.
  3. If the builder elects to repair some, but not all of, the claimed unmet standards, the builder shall, at the same time it makes its offer, set forth with particularity in writing the reasons, and the support for those reasons, for not repairing all claimed unmet standards.
  4. If the builder fails to complete the repair within the time specified in the repair plan, the claimant is released from the requirements of this chapter and may proceed with the filing of an action. If this occurs, the standards set forth in the other chapters of this title shall continue to apply to the action.
  5. The builder may not obtain a release or waiver of any kind in exchange for the repair work mandated by this chapter. At the conclusion of the repair, the claimant may proceed with filing an action for violation of the applicable standard or for a claim of inadequate repair, or both, including all applicable damages available under Section 944.
  6. If the applicable statute of limitations has otherwise run during this process, the time period for filing a complaint or other legal remedies for violation of any provision of this title, or for a claim of inadequate repair, is extended from the time of the original claim by the claimant to 100 days after the repair is completed, whether or not the particular violation is the one being repaired. If the builder fails to acknowledge the claim within the time specified, elects not to go through this statutory process, or fails to request an inspection within the time specified, the time period for filing a complaint or other legal remedies for violation of any provision of this title is extended from the time of the original claim by the claimant to 45 days after the time for responding to the notice of claim has expired. If the builder elects to attempt to enforce its own nonadversarial procedure in lieu of the procedure set forth in this chapter, the time period for filing a complaint or other legal remedies for violation of any provision of this part is extended from the time of the original claim by the claimant to 100 days after either the completion of the builder’s alternative nonadversarial procedure, or 100 days after the builder’s alternative nonadversarial procedure is deemed unenforceable, whichever is later.
    1. If the builder has invoked this chapter and completed a repair, prior to filing an action, if there has been no previous mediation between the parties, the homeowner or his or her legal representative shall request mediation in writing. The mediation shall be limited to four hours, except as otherwise mutually agreed before a nonaffiliated mediator selected and paid for by the builder. At the homeowner’s sole option, the homeowner may agree to split the cost of the mediator and if he or she does so, the mediator shall be selected jointly. The mediator shall have sufficient availability such that the mediation will occur within 15 days after the request for mediation is received and shall occur at a mutually
    2. convenient location within the county where the action is pending. In the event that a mediation is used at this point, any applicable statutes of limitations shall be tolled from the date of the request to mediate until the next court day after the mediation is completed, or the 100-day period, whichever is later.
  7. (a) Nothing in this chapter prohibits the builder from making only a cash offer and no repair. In this situation, the homeowner is free to accept the offer, or he or she may reject the offer and proceed with the filing of an action. If the latter occurs, the standards of the other chapters of this title shall continue to apply to the action.

(b) The builder may obtain a reasonable release in exchange for the cash payment. The builder may negotiate the terms and conditions of any reasonable release in terms of scope and consideration in conjunction with a cash payment under this chapter.

930. (a) The time periods and all other requirements in this chapter are to be strictly construed, and, unless extended by the mutual agreement of the parties in accordance with this chapter, shall govern the rights and obligations under this title. If a builder fails to act in accordance with this section within the timeframes mandated, unless extended by the mutual agreement of the parties as evidenced by a postclaim written confirmation by the affected homeowner demonstrating that he or she has knowingly and voluntarily extended the statutory timeframe, the claimant may proceed with filing an action. If this occurs, the standards of the other chapters of this title shall continue to apply to the action.

(b) If the claimant does not conform with the requirements of this chapter, the builder may bring a motion to stay any subsequent court action or other proceeding until the requirements of this chapter have been satisfied. The court, in its discretion, may award the prevailing party on such a motion, his or her attorney’s fees and costs in bringing or opposing the motion.

  1. If a claim combines causes of action or damages not covered by this part, including, without limitation, personal injuries, class actions, other statutory remedies, or fraud-based claims, the claimed unmet standards shall be administered according to this part, although evidence of the property in its unrepaired condition may be introduced to support the respective elements of any such cause of action. As to any fraud-based claim, if the fact that the property has been repaired under this chapter is deemed admissible, the trier of fact shall be informed that the repair was not voluntarily accepted by the homeowner. As to any class action claims that address solely the incorporation of a defective component into a residence, the named and unnamed class members need not comply with this chapter.
  2. Subsequently discovered claims of unmet standards shall be administered separately under this chapter, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. However, in the case of a detached single family residence, in the same home, if the subsequently discovered claim is for a violation of the same standard as that which has already been initiated by the same claimant and the subject of a currently pending action, the claimant need not reinitiate the process as to the same standard. In the case of an attached project, if the subsequently discovered claim is for a violation of the same standard for a connected component system in the same building as has already been initiated by the same claimant, and the subject of a currently pending action, the claimant need not reinitiate this process as to that standard.
  3. If any enforcement of these standards is commenced, the fact that a repair effort was made may be introduced to the trier of fact. However, the claimant may use the condition of the property prior to the repair as the basis for contending that the repair work was inappropriate, inadequate, or incomplete, or that the violation still exists. The claimant need not show that the repair work resulted in further damage nor that damage has continued to occur as a result of the violation.
  4. Evidence of both parties’ conduct during this process may be introduced during a subsequent enforcement action, if any, with the exception of any mediation. Any repair efforts undertaken by the builder, shall not be considered settlement communications or offers of settlement and are not inadmissible in evidence on such a basis.
  5. To the extent that provisions of this chapter are enforced and those provisions are substantially similar to provisions in Section 1375 of the Civil Code, but an action is subsequently commenced under Section 1375 of the Civil Code, the parties are excused from performing the substantially similar requirements under Section 1375 of the Civil Code.
    1. Each and every provision of the other chapters of this title apply to subcontractors, material suppliers, individual product manufacturers, and design professionals to the extent that the subcontractors, material suppliers, individual product manufacturers, and design professionals caused, in whole or in part, a violation of a particular standard as the result of a negligent act or omission or a breach of contract. In addition to the affirmative defenses set forth in Section 945.5, a subcontractor, material supplier, design professional, individual product manufacturer, or other entity may also offer common law and contractual defenses as applicable to any claimed violation of a standard. All actions by a claimant or builder to enforce an express contract, or any provision thereof, against a subcontractor, material supplier, individual product manufacturer, or design professional is preserved. Nothing in this title
    2. modifies the law pertaining to joint and several liability for subcontractors, material suppliers, individual product manufacturer, and design professionals that contribute to any specific violation of this title. However, this section does not apply to any subcontractor, material supplier, individual product manufacturer, or design professional to which strict liability would apply.
  6. Nothing in this title shall be interpreted to eliminate or abrogate the requirement to comply with Section 411.35 of the Code of Civil Procedure or to affect the liability of design professionals, including architects and architectural firms, for claims and damages not covered by this title.
  7. This title applies only to residences originally sold on or after January 1, 2003.

CHAPTER 5. PROCEDURE

941. (a) Except as specifically set forth in this title, no action may be brought to recover under this title more than 10 years after substantial completion of the improvement but not later than the date of recordation of a valid notice of completion.

(b)
As used in this section, ‘‘action’’ includes an action for indemnity brought against a person arising out of that person’s performance or furnishing of services or materials referred to in this title, except that a cross-complaint for indemnity may be filed pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 428.10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in an action which has been brought within the time period set forth in subdivision (a).
(c)
The limitation prescribed by this section shall not be asserted by way of defense by any person in actual possession or the control, as owner, tenant or otherwise, of such an improvement, at the time any deficiency in the improvement constitutes the proximate cause for which it is proposed to make a claim or bring an action.
(d)
Sections 337.15 and 337.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall not apply to actions under this title.
(e)
Existing statutory and decisional law regarding tolling of the statute of limitations shall apply to the time periods for filing an action or making a claim under this title, except that repairs made pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 910), with the exception of the tolling provision contained in Section 927, do not extend the period for filing an action, or restart the time limitations contained in subdivisions
(a)
or (b) if 7091 of the Business and Professions Code. If a builder arranges for a contractor to perform a repair pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 910), as to the builder the time period for calculating the statute of limitation in subdivisions (a) or (b) if Section

7091 of the Business and Professions Code shall pertain to the substantial completion of the original construction and not to the date of repairs under this title. The time limitations established by this title do not apply to any action by a claimant for a contract or express contractual provision. Causes of action and damages to which this chapter does not apply are not limited by this section. In order to make a claim for violation of the standards set forth in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896), a homeowner need only demonstrate, in accordance with the applicable evidentiary standard, that the home does not meet the applicable standard, subject to the affirmative defenses set forth in Section 945.5. No further showing of causation or damages is required to meet the burden of proof regarding a violation of a standard set forth in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 896), provided that the violation arises out of, pertains to, or is related to, the original construction.

942. (a) Except as provided in this title, no other cause of action for a claim covered by this title or for damages recoverable under Section 944 is allowed. In addition to the rights under this title, this title does not apply to any action by a claimant to enforce a contract or express contractual provision, or any action for fraud, personal injury, or violation of a statute. Damages awarded for the items set forth in Section 944 in such other cause of action shall be reduced by the amounts recovered pursuant to Section 944 for violation of the standards set forth in this title.

(b) As to any claims involving a detached single-family home, the homeowner’s right to the reasonable value of repairing any nonconformity is limited to the repair costs, or the diminution in current value of the home caused by the nonconformity, whichever is less, subject to the personal use exception as developed under common law.

  1. If a claim for damages is made under this title, the homeowner is only entitled to damages for the reasonable value of repairing any violation of the standards set forth in this title, the reasonable cost of repairing any damages caused by the repair efforts, the reasonable cost of repairing and rectifying any damages resulting from the failure of the home to meet the standards, the reasonable cost of removing and replacing any improper repair by the builder, reasonable relocation and storage expenses, lost business income if the home was used as a principal place of a business licensed to be operated from the home, reasonable investigative costs for each established violation, and all other costs or fees recoverable by contract or statute.
  2. The provisions, standards, rights, and obligations set forth in this title are binding upon all original purchasers and their successors-in-interest. For purposes of this title, associations and others having the rights set forth in Section 383 of the Code of Civil Procedure

shall be considered to be original purchasers and shall have standing to enforce the provisions, standards, rights, and obligations set forth in this title.

945.5. A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:

(a)
To the extent it is caused by an unforeseen act of nature which caused the structure not to meet the standard. For purposes of this section an ‘‘unforeseen act of nature’’ means a weather condition, earthquake, or manmade event such as war, terrorism, or vandalism, in excess of the design criteria expressed by the applicable building codes, regulations, and ordinances in effect at the time of original construction.
(b)
To the extent it is caused by a homeowner’s unreasonable failure to minimize or prevent those damages in a timely manner, including the failure of the homeowner to allow reasonable and timely access for inspections and repairs under this title. This includes the failure to give timely notice to the builder after discovery of a violation, but does not include damages due to the untimely or inadequate response of a builder to the homeowner’s claim.
(c)
To the extent it is caused by the homeowner or his or her agent, employee, subcontractor, independent contractor, or consultant by virtue of their failure to follow the builder’s or manufacturer’s recommendations, or commonly accepted homeowner maintenance obligations. In order to rely upon this defense as it relates to a builder’s recommended maintenance schedule, the builder shall show that the homeowner had written notice of these schedules and recommendations and that the recommendations and schedules were reasonable at the time they were issued.
(d)
To the extent it is caused by the homeowner or his or her agent’s or an independent third party’s alterations, ordinary wear and tear, misuse, abuse, or neglect, or by the structure’s use for something other than its intended purpose.
(e)
To the extent that the time period for filing actions bars the claimed violation.
(f)
As to a particular violation for which the builder has obtained a valid release.
(g)
To the extent that the builder’s repair was successful in correcting the particular violation of the applicable standard.
As to any causes of action to which this statute does not apply, all applicable affirmative defenses are preserved.

California Construction Expert Witness Directory - Continued


Find Credentialed Construction Experts in the fields of Architecture, Civil and Structural Engineering.  General Engineering, Building and Specialty Contractors with the collective experience gained through more than 4000 construction defect and claims related litigations.

To find construction, engineering and forensic architecture expert witnesses, please click  the following listed areas of expertise in the left navigation bar.
Forensic Architect Metallurgy Expert Witness Mobile Homes Expert Witness Plumbing & HVAC Expert Witness Pools & Spas Expert Witness Roofing – Built Up Roofing Expert Witness Roofing – Industrial Expert Witness Roofing – Membrane System Expert Witness Roofing – Tile, Composition Expert Witness Safety Engineering Expert Witness Water Utility Expert Witness John Springman
forensic architect

Master of Architecture, University of Illinois
Licensed Architect, California
Licensed Architect, Colorado
Licensed Architect, Nevada
Licensed Architect, Texas
NCARB Certification
California Supplemental Examination Commissioner, California State Board of Architects

Email: jspringman@construction-expert-witness.com
Contact

Industrial Design Expert Witness Construction Delay Claims Analysis Expert Witness Construction Acceleration Claims Expert Witness Construction Contracts Expert Witness Industrial Hygiene Expert Witness Mold Damage Analysis Expert Witness Mold Remediation Contractor Expert Witness Landscape Design Expert Witness Lath & Plaster Expert Witness EIFS – Exterior Insulated Finish Systems Expert Witness Mapping & Surveying Expert Witness Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness Metal Roofing Expert Witness Mark Chapman
consulting civil engineer
general building contractor

Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, 1991, California State University, Long Beach
Registered Civil Engineer for California, 52142, 1994
Registered Civil Engineer for Arizona, 36022
Registered Civil Engineer for Nevada, 014532
Licensed General Building Contractor, B-632445, State of California


Contact


Consulting Architect Expert Witness ADA Compliance Expert Witness Architects Liability Expert Witness Architectural Forensics Expert WitnessMasonry, Brick, Stone Expert Witness CMU Walls Expert Witness Retaining Walls Flooring – Tile, Travertine, Tile, Stamped Concrete Expert Witness Civil Engineering Expert Witness Concrete –Poured in Place Expert Witness Concrete – Structural Expert Witness Concrete – Slabs, Foundations, Structural Expert Witness Concrete – Post Tensioned Slabs Expert Witness Construction Standards of Care Expert Witness Construction General Contracting Expert Witness Construction Engineering Expert Witness Construction Cost Estimating Expert Witness Construction Management Expert Witness Construction Monitoring Expert Witness Stan Bezue architect
building envelope expert
consulting general contractor

Bachelor of Architecture, Southern University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Licensed Architect, California
Licensed General Building Contractor, B-00846803, State of California
Member, American Institute of Architects


Contact
Matt Nardella Matthew J. Nardella, architect
ada compliance consultant

Licensed Architect, State of California
Registered Residential Designer, State of Nevada
Bachelor of Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
California Supplemental Oral Examination Commissioner, California State Board of Architectural Examiners
Organizational Member, American Concrete Institute


Contact
John Mancini architect, Alabama Construction Expert Witness Directory, Alaska Construction Expert Witness Directory, Arizona Construction Expert Witness Directory, Arkansas Construction Expert Witness Directory, California Construction Expert Witness Directory, Colorado Construction Expert Witness Directory, Connecticut Construction Expert Witness Directory, Delaware Construction Expert Witness Directory, Florida Construction Expert Witness Directory, Georgia Construction Expert Witness Directory, Hawaii Construction Expert Witness Directory, Idaho Construction Expert Witness Directory, Illinois Construction Expert Witness Directory John B. A. Mancini - architect
general building contractor
ada design-compliance expert

Licensed Architect, California
Licensed General Contractor — B, State of California
California Supplemental Examination Commissioner, California State Board of Architects
Certificate, High Density Urban Planning, Urban Land Institute
Guest Speaker, American Society of Consulting Engineers (Forensic Evidence Collection)


Contact
Doug Gorrie forensic architect, Iowa Construction Expert Witness Directory, Kansas Construction Expert Witness Directory, Kentucky Construction Expert Witness Directory, Louisiana Construction Expert Witness Directory, Maine Construction Expert Witness Directory, Maryland Construction Expert Witness Directory, Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness Directory, Michigan Construction Expert Witness Directory, Minnesota Construction Expert Witness Directory, Mississippi Construction Expert Witness Directory, Missouri Construction Expert Witness Directory, Montana Construction Expert Witness Directory, Nebraska Construction Expert Witness Directory Douglas F. Gorrie
consulting architect

Licensed Architect, California
Licensed Architect, Nevada
Licensed Architect, Arizona
Licensed Architect, Texas
NCARB Certified
Organizational Member, American Concrete Institute
Bachelor of Architecture, University of Oregon


Contact

California Construction Expert Witness Directory -  Engineering, and Forensic Architecture Expert Witnesses By State

Alabama  Alaska  Arizona  Arkansas  California  Colorado  Connecticut  Georgia Florida  Georgia  Hawaii  Idaho  Illinois  Iowa  Kansas  Kentucky  Louisiana  Maine Maryland  Massachusetts  Michigan  Minnesota  Mississippi  Missouri  Montana Nebraska  Nevada  New Hampshire  New Jersey  New Mexico  New York  North Carolina  North Dakota   Ohio  Oklahoma  Oregon  Pennsylvania  Puerto Rico  Rhode Island  South Carolina  South Dakota  Tennessee  Texas  Utah  Vermont  Virginia Virgin Islands  Washington  West Virginia  Wisconsin  Wyoming

CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS - PROJECT EXPERIENCE

PROJECT EXPERIENCE - Construction Defect and Claims Litigation Case Bio's and Summaries. For an initial consultation or discussion regarding a new matter please arrange a confidential consultation



 
U.C. Riverside Science Library
A project involving the catastrophic failure of large-diameter underground air-conditioning chiller lines and the resulting settlement of fill materials, attendant water damage to adjacent structures, and loss of use. CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS CONSULTANTS developed repair and damage evaluations which were instrumental in the successful prosecution of subsequent subrogation action.


 
Lish Residence
Located in Twinsburg, Ohio, the claim involves EIFS exterior cladding, alleged window issues, and other building code deficiencies. Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc. performed an evaluation of the plans, construction documents, and installation. Our consulting, design and construction professionals provided project monitoring, observed and documented removal and replacement of system.


 
UCLA Northwest Housing Complex
A construction expert witness designation on a project involving the recently completed Northwest Housing Complex on the UCLA campus. The complex consists of 3 multi-story residential units and a large, five-story multipurpose facility encompassing classrooms, auditoriums, a food facility, and campus support services. Repairs and damages amounting to $18,000,000 were addressed and included alleged deficiencies in structural and fire-resistive systems and failures in exterior waterproofing systems and materials resulting in water intrusion and mold growth.


 
Las Vegas Club, Las Vegas Nevada
A $5,000,000 remediation construction expert witness designation included analysis of EIFS cladding and related exterior fenestration at the hotel tower portion of the casino. Specialized protocols were developed in order to accomplish exterior repairs without disruption of normal hotel and casino operations and to minimize street-level impact on guests. Special fenestration components and related interface details were developed in order to integrate repairs at the South Wall Facade while maintaining a continuous one-hour minimum fire-rating at this area.


 
San Bernardino County Medical Center
A $251,000,000 regional medical center constructed in San Bernardino County, California. Claims included alleged failure of terrazzo flooring materials and water damages and mold contamination related to shower membrane leaks in patient rooms. Construction expert witness designation included analysis of repair protocols developed by our consulting construction and design professionals were implemented resulting in substantial savings to insurers and continual, uninterrupted hospital operations during mold abatement remediation and repair.


 
Dickens Senior Housing Project, Sherman Oaks California
A project involving water intrusion at a senior citizen condominium facility. The complex consists of a two-story wood-framed structure over a combination above- and below-grade, cast-in-place concrete parking structure. Construction defect claims included water intrusion through roofing assemblies, stucco wall and window systems, and membrane waterproofing materials at public courtyards and walkways over the parking structure. Special repair protocols were developed with regard to sound and dust mitigation and a sophisticated relocation schedule was prepared in order to minimize resident discomfort and displacement.


 
Four Seasons Housing, Inc.
Located in Cincinnati, Ohio, the claim involves alleged structural and installation issues resulting in substantial interior and exterior damage. CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS CONSULTANTS provided evaluation of plans, engineering, site conditions, and manufactures installation requirements.


 
Banning’s Landing Community Center, Wilmington, Port of Los Angeles
A $5,000,000 state-of-the-art multipurpose cultural and meeting facility located in the port community of Wilmington, California. Construction defect claims arose from damages caused by prolonged weather exposure resulting from numerous construction delays. Due to complex design elements and the interpolation of multiple architectural, structural, and material finish elements, the development of repair protocols presented us with unique challenges. Adding to the complexity of the project was the complete remediation of the center prior to our involvement, which forced a heavy reliance on construction documents and project logs.


 
Mission Ridge Apartments, Las Vegas Nevada
A $9,000,000 project involving a 256-unit, 16-building apartment complex in Las Vegas, Nevada. Repair and damage evaluations were developed relative to significant deterioration of exterior stucco wall systems, correlating to multiple contributing sources. Our construction consulting and design experts provided in-depth analysis of leak history documents, historical photographs of previously repaired damage, and deficiency listings and repair recommendations developed during mediation. As a result of this analysis, our team was able to successfully allocate responsibility to multiple sources outside the insured’s scope of work, resulting in a savings to the carrier in excess of 96% off the mediation demand.


 
Union Bank Plaza, Los Angeles
A $1,000,000 renovation and tenant improvement project encompassing the street level plaza and mezzanine promenade fronting the Union Bank building in downtown Los Angeles. Responding to alleged construction defects included repair and damage evaluations that were developed relating to failed substrate topping slab materials, horizontal and vertical waterproof membrane systems over a subterranean garage, and the failed application of granite pavers and building wainscot cladding.


 
Senior Systems Technology, Palmdale California
A construction defect and claims project involving the failure of the slab-on-grade in a $7,000,000 high-tech computer manufacturing facility and the resulting damage to sophisticated static electricity-dissipating flooring systems.


 
Southern Ohio Health Services Facility
In this project, located in Seaman, Ohio, we undertook site investigation and testing in order to determine issues pertinent to work performed by the framing contractor.


 
Pasadena Industrial Building
This project had issues including foundation deformation and subsidence. The foundation was augmented and leveled by the use of helical anchors. The building was reinforced. Slab replacement was required.


 
Cleveland Fourplex
Multi-family development located in Cleveland, Ohio, our team of consulting general building contractors completed excavating, foundation, and waterproofing inspections on single and multi-family projects throughout northeastern Ohio.


 
Amburn Residence
35,000 sf home, located in Mount Pleasant, SC. Alleged defects include failure of the EIFS exterior cladding causing water intrusion and substantial damage to framing materials. Complete analysis of exterior cladding, roofing, and fenestration were completed in support of the general liability carriers legal team.


 
Carrell Residence
Project located in Simpsonville, South Carolina, involving water intrusion and mold claims. Investigations by our consulting general building and mold remediation contractors have identified elements of the roofing, siding, and balcony waterproofing had contributed to the water intrusion and associated mold issues.


 
Centex Homes
Seventeen homes in this project, located at the Charleston National Country Club, have front elevations that were clad with EIFS. Damage and repair evaluations were developed to rectify the issues at minimal cost without displacing the residents.


 
Clifford Pierce Middle School
Located in Merrillville, Indiana, a scaffolding accident left a worker with permanent injuries. Evaluation of OSHA regulations, weather, and job site conditions was performed by design and construction safety experts to assist in the settlement and allocation of responsibility.


 
Duncan Residence
45,000 sf plantation home near Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, involving allegedly defective EIFS siding. Our design and construction consultants provided an evaluation of defects and repair costs, and assisted in the building product manufacturers legal team in reaching a settlement of a $750,000 construction defect claim for less than $80,000.


 
Eckstein Residence
A $1.7 million home in Paducah, Kentucky. Allegations of water intrusion and mold. Investigation by our consulting general building contractors of windows and deck waterproofing assisted in reaching a settlement with plaintiffs at a significant reduction from the original litigation demand.


 
Hadwin-White GMC
Near Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Remodeling of the building consisted of EIFS installation and roof alteration, allegedly causing water intrusion and subsequent damage. Our construction and design professionals provided investigation of design and installation to determine potential design deficiencies and damage repair costs.


 
King Residence
Located in Columbia, South Carolina, alleged defects include water intrusion at the front picture window. Investigation by our consulting team addressed alleged deficiencies relating to stone veneer and window construction.


 
Logan-Todd Regional Water District
$3.7 million project of a raw water intake plant on the Cumberland River in Hartsville, Kentucky. Issues include contracts, delay claims, and liquidated damages. Evaluation of site conditions, and conditions relating to contract firms was completed resulting in substantial savings to our client.


 
Sither Residence
Located in Paducah, Kentucky, defect claims involve drainage and structural issues, causing severe damage to rear elevation of the structure. Expert witness services and analysis included evaluation of plans, engineering, and site conditions.


 
Smith Residence
Located in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, the claim involves allegedly defective EIFS exterior cladding, allegedly defective fenestration, and other building code deficiencies. Our construction and design professionals provided reports, and assisted legal professionals in reaching a negotiated settlement at substantial savings to the client.


 
Oak Park Calabasas
Construction defect litigation involving a  360 unit condominium development located in the City of Calabasas, California.


 
Dreamworks
Construction defect litigation at the Dreamworks Animation Studio and campus, a motion picture and television production facility located in Glendale, California.


 
One Harbor
Construction defect litigation and construction claims case. Twin, high rise condominium towers overlooking San Diego Bay, Coronado Island, and downtown San Diego.


 
Fullerton Police Department
Construction defect and claims litigation involving the expansion and renovation of the Fullerton Police Department headquarters, an administrative and jail facility a public works project serving the City of Fullerton, California.


 
Cal State Fullerton
A construction defect litigation at a public university science laboratory facility on the campus of California State University, Fullerton.


 
701 Ocean
Construction defect and claims litigation relevant to a four-story condominium structure with a below-grade parking facilities and a rooftop pool/sun deck, overlooking the Pacific Ocean on Ocean Avenue in Santa Monica, California.


 
Hennessey’s Tavern
A construction claims project at a popular restaurant and tavern located on the Strand in Redondo Beach, California.


 
Palmdale Marketplace
Large retail project and regional shopping center anchored by multiple major tenants and located in Palmdale, California. Expert designation in construction defect litigation involved destructive testing, cost analysis, repair monitoring and project management. Our team of consulting general building contractors provided support to legal professionals resulting in substantial recovery in negotiated settlement with builder and sub trades.


 
Schaff v. Boulder Development
In this construction defect case consisting of more than one hundred individual houses in Mentone, it was alleged that improper site preparations left large cobbles and under-compacted soils materials that caused excessive water to pass beneath dwellings. Water vapor transmission through slabs causing damage to interiors and deterioration of concrete slabs through sulfate attack. Contemplated repair scenarios included evaluation of costs relating to soils injection with 3M product to provide underside slab waterproofing, construction of foundation cut-off trenches filled with concrete, and underpinning foundations.


 
Prince Turki Residence
A 45,000 sf private residence located in Bel Air, California. Construction defect litigation.


 
Plaza Temecula
A multi-tenant regional shopping center and retail complex and light commercial complex located in Temecula, California.


 
Yorba Linda Community Center
A state-of-the-art, multipurpose community and senior center facility located in Yorba Linda, California.


 
University of California Riverside v. Barnhard - Construction defect litigation at a public university. Allegations and construction expert witness designation involved a high pressure line break causing flood and erosion to UCR’s new science building. Repairs required extensive excavation, re-compaction, and repair to site and building.

 


 
CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN EXPERT WITNESS CATEGORIES
Click the links below to find qualified construction and design experts in the following categories
Forensic Architects   General Contracting Experts   Building Envelope Experts   Civil Engineering Experts   Electrical  Expert Witness
consulting engineers, general contracting expert witness, forensic architects, building envelope experts, construction defect and claims experts

 

California SB 800 (Builders Right to Repair) Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:

A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.

A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:

  • an unforeseen act of nature
  • homeowner's unreasonable failure to minimize or prevent those
  • To the extent it is caused by the homeowner or his or her agent,
    employee, subcontractor, independent contractor, or consultant by
    virtue of their failure to follow the builder's or manufacturer's
    recommendations, or commonly accepted homeowner maintenance
    obligations. In order to rely upon this defense as it relates to a builder's
    recommended maintenance schedule, the builder shall show that the
    homeowner had written notice of these schedules and recommendations
    and that the recommendations and schedules were reasonable at the time
    they were issued.
  • alterations, ordinary wear and tear, misuse, abuse, or neglect, or by the
    structure's use for something other than its intended purpose.
  • the time period for filing actions bars the claimed violation.
  • as to a particular violation for which the builder has obtained a valid
    release.
  • the builder's repair was successful in correcting the particular violation
    of the applicable standard.

Builder Compliance Requirement: Builders must supply maintenance and warranty documentation. Although, the Act is designed to reduce litigation and resolve construction defect claims to the satisfaction of all parties; nevertheless, the builder must be aware of the requirements for providing notice and other documentation to homeowners throughout the selling process.

Legislative Ammendments to SB800: The California legislature recently adopted amendment to clarify some ambiguities in the construction defect claim laws. Most importantly Builders need provide notices and required information at the time of sale, not upon occupancy. This includes any maintenance obligations and schedules.