BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania office building expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania housing expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Pocono Pines Pennsylvania
    Pocono Pines Pennsylvania architecture expert witnessPocono Pines Pennsylvania construction forensic expert witnessPocono Pines Pennsylvania stucco expert witnessPocono Pines Pennsylvania architectural engineering expert witnessPocono Pines Pennsylvania contractor expert witnessPocono Pines Pennsylvania reconstruction expert witnessPocono Pines Pennsylvania testifying construction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pocono Pines, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pocono Pines Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Gr Dubois Area
    Local # 3959
    PO Box 664
    Du Bois, PA 15801
    Pocono Pines Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Clearfield County Chapter
    Local # 3903
    PO Box 512
    Clearfield, PA 16830

    Pocono Pines Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Clinton Co Builders Association
    Local # 3980
    PO Box 147
    Lock Haven, PA 17745

    Pocono Pines Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101

    Pocono Pines Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844

    Pocono Pines Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360

    Pocono Pines Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    West Branch-Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3968
    1610 Whitman Street
    Williamsport, PA 17701

    Pocono Pines Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pocono Pines Pennsylvania


    Deck Police - The New Mandate for HOA's Takes Safety to the Next Level

    California Supreme Court Declares that Exclusionary Rule for Failing to Comply with Expert Witness Disclosures Applies at the Summary Judgment Stage

    A Quick Checklist for Subcontractors

    False Implied Certifications in Making Payment Requests: What We Can Learn from Lance Armstrong

    Drawing the Line: In Tennessee, the Economic Loss Doctrine Does Not Apply to Contracts for Services

    Presidential Memorandum Promotes Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West

    Are Defense Costs In Addition to Policy Limits?

    Florida Federal Court Reinforces Principle That Precise Policy Language Is Required Before An Insurer Can Deny Coverage Based On An Exclusion

    Understanding the Details: Suing Architects and Engineers Can Get Technical

    One to Watch: Case Takes on Economic Loss Rule and Professional Duties

    Regional US Airports Are Back After Years of Decay

    Florida Issues Emergency Fraud Prevention Rule to Protect Policyholders in Wake of Catastrophic Storms

    2019 Promotions - New Partners at Haight

    New Addition to the ASCE/SEI 7-22 Standard Protects Buildings from a 500-year Flood Event

    Hurricane Handbook: A Policyholder's Guide to Handling Claims during Hurricane Season

    Starting July 1, 2020 General Contractors are “Employers” for All Workers on Their Jobsite

    Property Owners Sue San Francisco Over Sinking Sidewalks

    Ten Firm Members Recognized as Super Lawyers or Rising Stars

    How Does Weather Impact a Foundation?

    Circuit Court Lacks Appellate Jurisdiction Over Order Compelling Appraisal

    Sureties and Bond Producers May Be Liable For a Contractor’s False Claims Act Violations

    Michigan Court of Appeals Remands Construction Defect Case

    Bridging Documents and Design-Build Warranties: Building Bridges to Avoid Pitfalls

    Why You May Not Want a Mandatory Mediation Clause in Your Construction Contract

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (9/4/24) – DOJ Sues RealPage, Housing Sales Increase and U.S. Can’t Build Homes Fast Enough

    Lasso Needed to Complete Vegas Hotel Implosion

    Freddie Mac Eases Mortgage Rules to Limit Putbacks

    Court of Appeals Discusses the Difference Between “Claims-Made” and “Occurrence-Based” Insurance Policies

    Condominiums and Homeowners Associations Remain Popular Housing Choices for U-S Homeowners

    Partner John Toohey is Nominated for West Coast Casualty’s Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence!

    The Federal Freeze Playbook: Key Steps for Government Contractors Amid a Potential Federal Funding Freeze

    A Court-Side Seat: Citizen Suits, “Facility” Management and Some Nuance for Your Hazard Ranking

    Apartment Construction Ominously Nears 25-Year High

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2025 Guide

    Is the Construction Industry Actually a Technology Hotbed?

    Quick Note: Do Your Homework When it Comes to Selecting Your Arbitrator

    Harmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says Court

    Damage Control: Major Rebuilds After Major Weather Events

    Major Changes in Commercial Construction Since 2009

    Houston Home Sales Fall for the First Time in Six Months

    Not Pandemic-Proof: The Ongoing Impact of COVID-19 on the Commercial Construction Industry

    How Many Bridges Does the Chesapeake Bay Need?

    Landmark San Diego Hotel Settles Defects Suit for $6.4 Million

    Hospital Settles Lawsuit over Construction Problems

    Scarce Cemetery Space Creates Prices to Die For: Cities

    Structure of Champlain Towers North Appears Healthy

    Homeowners Should Beware, Warn Home Builders

    Super Lawyers Recognized Five Lawyers from Hunton’s Insurance Recovery Group

    Think Twice Before Hedging A Position Or Defense On A Speculative Event Or Occurrence

    Court Holds That Property Insurance Does Not Cover Economic Loss From Purchasing Counterfeit Vintage Wine
    n itemprop="name">Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    The New “White Collar” Exemption Regulations

    Richest NJ Neighborhood Fights Plan for Low-Cost Homes on Toxic Dump

    Anatomy of an Insurance Dispute

    Safety Versus a False Sense of Security: Challenges to the Use of Construction Cranes

    How Data Drives the Future of Design

    Battle of “Other Insurance” Clauses

    I-35W Bridge Collapse may be Due to “Inadequate Load Capacity”

    Affordable Global Housing Will Cost $11 Trillion

    Be Careful with Good Faith Payments

    Biden’s Solar Plans Run Into a Chinese Wall

    No Coverage for Installation of Defective Steel Framing

    Court of Appeals Confirms that King County Superior Court’s Jury Selection Process Satisfies Due Process Requirements

    Insurer's Late Notice Defense Fails on Summary Judgment

    Palo Alto Proposes Time Limits on Building Permits

    Real Property Alert: Recording Notice of Default as Trustee Before Being Formally Made the Trustee Does Not Make Foreclosure Sale Void

    You Can Pay Me Now, or . . .

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Who Needs Them”

    Pay-If-Paid: What You Need to Know Before Signing on the Dotted Line

    Insurer Disposes of Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    Index Demonstrates Increase in Builders’ Sentiment

    London Office Builders Aren’t Scared of Brexit Anymore

    Motion for Reconsideration Challenging Appraisal Determining Cause of Loss Denied

    Ruling Dealing with Constructive Changes, Constructive Suspension, and the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

    How to Determine the Deadline for Recording a California Mechanics Lien

    UPDATE: ACS Obtains Additional $13.6 Million for General Contractor Client After $19.2 Million Jury Trial Victory

    ASCE Statement on Hurricane Milton and Environmental Threats

    CA Supreme Court: Right to Repair Act (SB 800) is the Exclusive Remedy for Residential Construction Defect Claims – So Now What?

    Were Condos a Bad Idea?

    Duke Energy Appeals N.C. Order to Excavate Nine Coal Ash Pits

    Cincinnati Team Secures Summary Judgment for Paving Company in Trip-and-Fall Case

    UCP Buys Citizen Homes

    New Notary Language For Mechanics Lien Releases and Stop Payment Notice Releases

    District Court's Ruling Affirmed in TCD v American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

    Constructive Change Directives / Directed Changes

    Massachusetts SJC Clarifies “Strict Compliance” Standard in Construction Contracts

    Hurdles with Triggering a Subcontractor Performance Bond

    Colorado Legislature Considering Making it Easier to Prevail on CCPA Claims

    Construction Termination Part 3: When the Contractor Is Firing the Owner

    OSHA Again Pushes Back Record-Keeping Rule Deadline

    Henderson Engineers Tests AI for Building Systems Design with Torch.AI

    Replacement of Gym Floor Due to Sloppy Paint Job is Not Resulting Loss
    Corporate Profile

    POCONO PINES PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Pocono Pines, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Pocono Pines' most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pocono Pines, Pennsylvania

    Kahana Feld Opens New Office in Sacramento, Adding Key Litigator and Expanding Northern California Footprint

    August 24, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 11, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce the opening of a new office in Sacramento, CA. This will be the firm’s 19th office across the United States. Partner Melvin F. Marcia has joined Kahana Feld and will lead the opening of the Sacramento office. He is joined by attorneys Matthew Brenner and Britney Lucchesi as well as paralegal Michelle Welcker. “We’re excited to welcome Melvin to the Kahana Feld team and expand our footprint in Northern California,” said Amir Kahana, Firmwide Managing Partner of Kahana Feld. “His addition strengthens Kahana Feld’s capabilities and will allow us to work more closely with our general liability, construction defect, and labor and employment clients in the Sacramento area while continuing to provide the level of service and experience they have come to expect from our firm.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Applying Jury Verdict Method in Quantifying Damages Due to Defective Specifications

    March 31, 2026 —
    An older case deals with three important considerations: (1) defective specifications; (2) whether the defective specifications were misleading or misrepresentative; and (3) applying the jury verdict method in quantifying damages. In Metric Construction Co., Inc. v. U.S., 80 Fed. Cl. 178 (Fed. Cl. 2008), a contractor was contracted by the federal government to construct a warehouse. There were defects in the structural steel design specifications underlying the standing seam metal roof installed by the contractor and, as a result, the roof system leaked causing damage. The contractor incurred significant costs in repairing the damage, and pursued recovery of these costs against the government. The contractor claimed the structural steel design serving as the framework for the metal roof was defective and misleading and caused the leaks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Four HHMR Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Editions of Best Lawyers®

    September 21, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is proud to announce that Best Lawyers® has recognized four HHMR attorneys in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America for their work in construction law and construction litigation. David M. McLain, Lisa Bondy Dunn, and Steven L. Heisdorffer earned recognition in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®. Ricky L. Nolen, Jr. earned recognition in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. For a firm that has deliberately focused its practice on construction law and construction litigation for nearly 25 years, we take particular pride in seeing that focus reflected in the recognition of lawyers across different generations of HHMR. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Traub Lieberman Recognized in the 2026 Edition of Chambers USA

    June 29, 2026 —
    In the 2026 edition of Chambers USA, Traub Lieberman has been awarded rankings in the following categories: Illinois – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer In the Chambers research, clients noted: "The team are technically very strong, responsive, and on top of their cases." Florida – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer In the Chambers research, clients noted: "Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry distinguishes itself through a combination of deep subject-matter expertise, responsiveness, and practical risk-management orientation." Commenters went on to say: “The team has deep knowledge of Florida property insurance statutes, regulations and case law, enabling effective handling of disputes, appeals and third-party litigation." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Traub Lieberman

    PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal—Fast-Track Capacity to Meet Rising Large-Load Demand

    May 12, 2026 —
    In January, we discussed the Statement of Principles jointly signed by the National Energy Dominance Council and governors across the mid-Atlantic region—framing accelerating demand (especially from large-scale data centers) as an emergency reliability issue for PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), the nation’s largest power grid operator. That policy signal is now becoming a near-term, accelerated procurement and contracting exercise. On April 8, 2026, PJM notified stakeholders of a critical issue fast path reliability backstop procurement process. PJM subsequently released a request for information (RFI) with respect to a proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement (RBP)—a one-time mechanism intended to attract significant new capacity to address projected reliability shortfalls driven by large-load growth. RBP compresses what is often a multiyear market and regulatory conversation into a fast-moving set of commercial choices. Developers, large loads, utilities and capital providers should be preparing now for (i) an accelerated bilateral contracting window and (ii) a standardized PJM-led backstop procurement if bilateral deals do not clear enough capacity. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Two Important Points Regarding the Miller Act

    September 15, 2026 —
    A recent Miller Act case, U.S. f/u/b/o Boundless Management Outsourcing Group, LLC v. Endurance Assurance Corp, 2026 WL 2241491 (D. Puerto Rico 2026), confirms two important points when it comes to the Miller Act. In this case, a subcontractor pursued a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit more than one year after its work was finished. The subcontractor also asserted a claim against the federal government. The lawsuit was dismissed. Below are two takeaway points to consider if you are dealing with a Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. First, as it relates the claim against the federal government, the federal district court followed authority that held that the Miller Act does NOT include a waiver of sovereign immunity against the federal government. “[T]he Court does not identify any clear language in the Miller Act expressly waiving the United States or its agencies’ sovereign immunity.” Endurance Assurance Corp., supra at *3. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Traub Lieberman Wins Affirmation of Judgment on Pleadings Before the Seventh Circuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Adam Joffe obtained affirmation of judgment from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of an Insurance Company. The Insurance Company filed suit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its Insured, a Roofing Contractor, in an underlying lawsuit. The Insurance Company issued a commercial general liability policy with a one-year policy term. The policy included an exclusion that barred coverage for any losses arising out of work the insured completed before the date the policy incepted. Reprinted courtesy of Dana A. Rice, Traub Lieberman and Adam P. Joffe, Traub Lieberman Mr. Rice may be contacted at drice@tlsslaw.com Mr. Joffe may be contacted at ajoffe@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...