BERT HOWE
  • custom homes expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania condominium expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania office building expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania custom home expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania tract home expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania production housing expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania
    New Washington Pennsylvania construction expert witnessNew Washington Pennsylvania consulting engineersNew Washington Pennsylvania construction expert witness consultantNew Washington Pennsylvania construction forensic expert witnessNew Washington Pennsylvania engineering consultantNew Washington Pennsylvania construction cost estimating expert witnessNew Washington Pennsylvania defective construction expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    New Washington, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines New Washington Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Adams County
    Local # 3920
    PO Box 3321
    Gettysburg, PA 17325
    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Fayette County
    Local # 3961
    PO Box 1323
    Uniontown, PA 15401
    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Somerset Co Builders Association
    Local # 3958
    PO Box 221
    Berlin, PA 15530

    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Franklin County Builders Association
    Local # 3912
    1102 Sheller Ave Ste C
    Chambersburg, PA 17201

    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Philadelphia
    Local # 3946
    1735 Market St Ste A432
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Chester & Delaware Co
    Local # 3941
    1502 McDaniel Dr
    West Chester, PA 19380

    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404

    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For New Washington Pennsylvania


    West Virginia Couple Claim Defects in Manufactured Home

    Firm Sued for Stopping Construction in Indiana Wants Case Tried in Germany

    Federal Government May Go to Different Green Building Standard

    Limitation on Coverage for Payment of Damages Creates Ambiguity

    The Hidden Dangers of Construction Defect Litigation: A Redux

    Exclusions Bar Coverage for Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Repair of Part May Necessitate Replacement of Whole

    Melissa Dewey Brumback Invited Into Claims & Litigation Management Alliance Membership

    Firm Claims Construction Defects in Hawaiian Homes

    Miller Wagers Gundlach’s Bearish Housing Position Loses

    Narrow House Has Wide Opposition

    Settlement Reached in Bridge Failure Lawsuit

    Engineers Found ‘Hundreds’ of Cracks in California Bridge

    Construction Law Alert: A Specialty License May Not Be Required If Work Covered By Another License

    UConn’s Law-School Library Construction Case Settled for Millions

    Policyholder Fails to Build Adequate Record to Support Bad Faith Claim

    Housing Starts in U.S. Beat 1 Million Pace for Second Month

    Small Airport to Grow with Tower

    South Carolina School District Investigated by IRS and FBI

    The Latest News on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

    Connecticut Court Clarifies Construction Coverage

    Considering Stormwater Management

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    Contractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization Program

    Indiana Court of Appeals Rules Against Contractor and Performance Bond Surety on Contractor's Differing Site Conditions Claim

    Vinny Testaverde Alleges $5 Million Mansion Riddled with Defects

    Settlement Payment May Preclude Finding of Policy Exhaustion: Scottsdale v. National Union

    Court finds subcontractor responsible for defending claim

    Subcontractor Sued for Alleged Defective Work

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Shares Fall on Wind-Down Measure

    Georgia Law: “An Occurrence Can Arise Where Faulty Workmanship Causes Unforeseen or Unexpected Damage to Other Property”

    City and Contractor Disclaim Responsibility for Construction Error that Lead to Blast

    Asbestos Client Alert: Court’s Exclusive Gatekeeper Role May not be Ignored or Shifted to a Jury

    Contractor’s Coverage For Additional Insured Established by Unilateral Contract

    El Paso Increases Surety Bond Requirement on Contractors

    Oregon to Add 258,000 Jobs by 2022, State Data Shows

    Harmon Tower Opponents to Try Mediation

    Pennsylvania “occurrence”

    Occurrence Found, Business Risk Exclusions Do Not Bar Coverage for Construction Defects

    District Court Awards Summary Judgment to Insurance Firm in Framing Case

    Los Angeles Construction Sites May Be on Fault Lines

    Ohio “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Sewage Treatment Agency Sues Insurer and Contractor after Wall Failure and Sewage Leak

    Rise in Single-Family Construction Anticipated in Michigan

    U.S. Supreme Court Weighs in on Construction Case

    Construction Defects through the Years

    Domtar Update

    Fracking Fears Grow as Oklahoma Hit by More Earthquakes Than California

    Florida Property Bill Passes Economic Affairs Committee with Amendments
    Corporate Profile

    NEW WASHINGTON PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The New Washington, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 4,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to New Washington's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    New Washington, Pennsylvania

    Review your Additional Insured Endorsement

    March 26, 2014 —
    In his blog, Construction Contractor Advisor, Craig Martin explained the importance of reviewing your additional insured endorsement. Martin pointed out that in Mississippi, the “Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in Woodward, LLC v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company, that a general contractor, named as an additional insured, did not have coverage for claims that a subcontractor performed faulty work.” The problem “was the language in the additional insured endorsement, which provided coverage for ongoing operations, not completed operations.” While Martin admitted that the case applies to Mississippi, he concluded that “the issue Midwestern readers should consider is the court’s conclusion that non-conformance with the plans, in essence a construction defect claim, arises from completed operations.” Read the full story...

    Los Angeles Construction Sites May Be on Fault Lines

    December 30, 2013 —
    California law prohibits building near or on top of earthquake fault lines, but Los Angeles County building officials may have used outdated information that misreported the location of certain faults. The Los Angeles Times reports that after their earlier articles on fault lines, the officials have started using newer maps. According to the older maps, an apartment building under construction on Brockton Avenue in Los Angeles is 1.9 miles away from the Santa Monica fault. But a more recent map, created by the state in 2010, shows that the fault line could potentially be right under the building site. The builders of another apartment building potentially located on the Santa Monica fault said that the city did not ask for a fault investigation. The Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety said that there was no official zone designation for the Santa Monica fault, and so did not require seismic studies. Read the full story...

    Home Numbers Remain Small While Homes Get Bigger

    June 28, 2013 —
    Catherine Rampell reports in the New York Times that while the number of single-family homes built in 2012 was still at the very bottom of the range, since the government starting recording this data in 1973, the medium size for these homes is at its largest ever. According to data collected by the Census Bureau, these homes also have more bedrooms and bathrooms than previously. Of all homes built in 2012, forty-one percent had four or more bedrooms and thirty percent had three or more bathrooms. Both of these were the highest percentages in those categories. Meanwhile, the size of newly-built rental units declined in 2012. While still larger than the average rental unit built in 1999 (the earliest date given in the article), there has been little change over the last decade. During the same period, the size of sale units in multi-family buildings did show an increase. Read the full story...

    Federal Court Rejects Insurer's Argument that Wisconsin Has Adopted the Manifestation Trigger for Property Policy

    April 03, 2013 —
    The federal district court disagreed with the insurer's strident claim that Wisconsin followed the manifestation trigger for deciding coverage under a homeowner's policy. Strauss v. Chubb Indem. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 2, 2013). Several years after their house was constructed, the insureds discovered water damage. Chubb denied the claim. The insureds sued. Chubb moved for summary judgment and argued that the loss first manifested many years after its policy expired. Further, Chubb argued that Wisconsin followed the manifestation trigger for first-party property insurance, meaning that only the insurance policy in effect when the loss manifested was required to respond. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred Eyerly
    Tred Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Another Colorado Construction Defect Reform Bill Dies

    May 07, 2014 —
    Colorado construction defects reform Senate Bill 220 died when “Senate President Morgan Carroll, D-Aurora, declined to call a second committee to hear” the bill, according to Ed Sealover writing for the Denver Business Journal. Sen. Carroll declared that the “bill backers” did not incorporate any of the “suggestions she or House Speaker Mark Ferrandino had given them.” “SB 220 would have required condo-unit owners to submit to alternative-dispute resolution such as arbitration or mediation if the unit developer required it,” Sealover reported. “And it would have required that a majority of members of a homeowners association agree to file a lawsuit, a standard significantly larger than the two-person bar that now must be met.” Bill Cosponsor Sen. Mark Scheffel, R-Castle Rock, “believes litigation reform” will become “an election issue and” that it “has strong momentum heading into the 2015 session.” Read the full story...

    CA Homeowners Challenging Alternate Pre-Litigation Procedures

    April 15, 2014 —
    Garret Murai on his California Construction Law blog discussed how some homeowners have challenged homebuilders who use alternative pre-litigation procedures instead of the rules of California’s Right to Repair Act (SB 800). “The Right to Repair Act, which was intended to help curb the then rising tide of residential construction defect litigation, provides mandatory pre-litigation procedures which must be followed in construction defect cases involving new residential construction,” Murai explained. “One of the major exceptions to the statutory pre-litigation procedures under SB 800, however, is that a homebuilder can opt to use its own alternative pre-litigation procedures if disclosed to a homebuyer.” Murai used The McCaffrey Group, Inc. v. Superior Court case to demonstrate that homeowners can challenge the builder’s use of alternative pre-litigation procedures, and win if they can prove that the alternate procedures are “unconscionable.” “For homebuilders, the take away is that, sure you can adopt your own alternative pre-litigation procedures under the Right to Repair,” Murai stated, “but if you do just know that they may be challenged by homeowners who may contend that they are unconscionable, which kinda defeats the whole idea behind SB 800 which was intended to reduce the amount of litigation the first place.” Read the full story...

    OSHA Extends Temporary Fall Protection Rules

    March 01, 2012 —

    OSHA announced that its current rules on fall protection for residential construction will remain in place until September 15, 2012. The current measures became effective in June 2011. Under the new rules, falls must be prevented by fall protection measures unless the measures can be shown to be unfeasible or even hazardous.

    Under the extension of the temporary enforcement measures, contractors who ask for compliance assistance with OSHA are given top priority and penalties can be reduced. OSHA has conducted more than 1,000 outreach sessions on the new rules.

    Read the full story…


    Few Homes Available to Reno Buyers, Plenty of Commercial Properties

    January 22, 2013 —
    Saying that "new home inventory does not exist," Mark Krueger of ArchCrest Commercial Partners tells the Reno Gazette Journal that this had lead to a problem, in that there are no homes for prospective buyers in the Reno and Sparks area. Adding to the problem is that investors are buying up resale homes with the intent of selling them at a profit later, which adds to the scarcity of available homes. While the residential market is suffering from not enough homes to satisfy buyers, there are ample commercial properties. As a result, there are no plans for any additional retail, office, or industrial projects in the Reno area for 2013. Vacancy rates are expected to fall only slightly to 12.3% for industrial properties and 17.7% for retail properties. Read the full story...