BERT HOWE
  • parking structure expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania tract home expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania production housing expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania custom home expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania office building expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania housing expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness New Washington Pennsylvania
    New Washington Pennsylvania construction cost estimating expert witnessNew Washington Pennsylvania roofing and waterproofing expert witnessNew Washington Pennsylvania consulting architect expert witnessNew Washington Pennsylvania architectural engineering expert witnessNew Washington Pennsylvania expert witness structural engineerNew Washington Pennsylvania architect expert witnessNew Washington Pennsylvania building envelope expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    New Washington, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines New Washington Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Adams County
    Local # 3920
    PO Box 3321
    Gettysburg, PA 17325
    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Fayette County
    Local # 3961
    PO Box 1323
    Uniontown, PA 15401
    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Somerset Co Builders Association
    Local # 3958
    PO Box 221
    Berlin, PA 15530

    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Franklin County Builders Association
    Local # 3912
    1102 Sheller Ave Ste C
    Chambersburg, PA 17201

    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Philadelphia
    Local # 3946
    1735 Market St Ste A432
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Chester & Delaware Co
    Local # 3941
    1502 McDaniel Dr
    West Chester, PA 19380

    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404

    New Washington Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For New Washington Pennsylvania


    Union THUGS Plead Guilty

    What to do about California’s Defect-Ridden Board of Equalization Building

    Construction Defects Up Price and Raise Conflict over Water Treatment Expansion

    July Sees Big Drop in Home Sales

    Ninth Circuit Affirms Duty to Defend CERCLA Section 104 (e) Letter

    S&P Suspended and Fined $80 Million in SEC, State Mortgage Bond Cases

    Home Construction Slows in Las Vegas

    Construction Venture Sues LAX for Nonpayment

    No Duty to Defend Under Pollution Policy

    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    Singer Ordered to Deposition in Construction Defect Case

    Homebuilding Held Back by Lack of Skilled Workers

    Lending Plunges to 17-Year Low as Rates Curtail Borrowing

    Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Supports Coverage

    Decline in Home Construction Brings Down Homebuilder Stocks

    Colorado Senate Committee Approves Construction Defect Bill

    Everyone's Moving to Seattle, and It's Stressing Out Sushi Lovers

    New Utah & Colorado Homebuilder Announced: Jack Fisher Homes

    U.S. Navy Sailors Sue Tokyo Utility Company Over Radiation Poisoning

    Construction Defect Journal Marks First Anniversary

    Before Celebrating the Market Rebound, Builders Need to Read the Fine Print: New Changes in Construction Law Coming Out of the Recession

    Locals Concerns over Taylor Swift’s Seawall Misdirected

    Denver Parking Garage Roof Collapses Crushing Vehicles

    Mortgage Whistleblower Stands Alone as U.S. Won’t Join Lawsuit

    Statute of Limitations Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Contractor Sentenced to 7 Years for “Hail Damage” Fraud

    Condominium Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect

    Ohio Condo Owners Sue Builder, Alleging Construction Defects

    Micropiles for bad soil: a Tarheel victory

    Colorado Senate Bill 13-052 Dies in Committee

    Lawsuits over Roof Dropped

    Over a Hundred Thousand Superstorm Sandy Cases Re-Opened

    Downtown Sacramento Building Riddled with Defects

    Benford’s Law: A Seldom Used Weapon in Forensic Accounting

    Sacramento’s Commercial Construction Market Heats Up

    Hail Damage Requires Replacement of Even Undamaged Siding

    New York City Construction: Boom Times Again?

    Housing Gains Not Leading to Hiring

    Electrical Subcontractor Sues over Termination

    Washington Court Limits Lien Rights of Construction Managers

    Indiana Court Enforces Contract Provisions rather than Construction Drawing Markings

    Aging-in-Place Features Becoming Essential for Many Home Buyers

    Foundation Arbitration Doesn’t Preclude Suing Over Cracks

    Sochi Construction Unlikely to be Completed by End of Olympic Games

    California Complex Civil Litigation Superior Court Panels

    Tiny Houses Big With U.S. Owners Seeking Economic Freedom

    Builder Waits too Long to Dispute Contract in Construction Defect Claim

    DoD Testing New Roofing System that Saves Energy and Water

    “Details Matter” is the Foundation in a Texas Construction Defect Suit

    City Drops Impact Fees to Encourage Commercial Development
    Corporate Profile

    NEW WASHINGTON PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The New Washington, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 4,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to New Washington's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    New Washington, Pennsylvania

    The Future of Construction Defects in Utah Unclear

    December 11, 2013 —
    In recent years, more courts have started to view construction defects as accidents, covered under insurance policies. In a post on the Parr Brown Gee & Loveless web site, Jeffrey D. Stevens writes that “the number of courts siding with insurance companies to deny contractors and subcontractors insurance coverage in construction defect lawsuits has been shrinking.” Recently, the Supreme Court of West Virginia “switched sides on this issue completely.” The Utah Supreme Court has not made a ruling on this, but the Federal District Court for the District of Utah and the Tenth Circuit have looked at Utah law and concluded that “under Utah law damage caused by construction defects is not accidental.” But in another case, “the district court determined that property damage allegedly caused by defective or defectively installed windows was caused by an accident.” Mr. Stevens thinks that “it is likely” that the Utah Supreme Court “will follow the increasing number of courts that have held that damage caused by construction defects is an accident for insurance purposes. Read the full story...

    Manhattan Home Sales Rise at Slower Pace as Prices Jump

    July 02, 2014 —
    Manhattan apartment sales rose at the slowest pace in more than a year, indicating a surge in demand is easing as prices jump and inventory climbs from record lows. Purchases of co-ops and condominiums increased 6.3 percent in the second quarter from a year earlier, the smallest gain since the start of 2013, according to a report today from appraiser Miller Samuel Inc. and brokerage Douglas Elliman Real Estate. The median price rose 5.2 percent to $910,000, and the average price per square foot surged 10 percent to $1,268. Higher prices are encouraging more sellers to list properties and softening competition among buyers. The market is taking a “breather” after sales rose by an average of 28 percent in each of the previous four quarters, said Jonathan Miller, president of New York-based Miller Samuel. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Prashant Gopal, Bloomberg
    Mr. Gopal may be contacted at pgopal2@bloomberg.net

    Builder and County Tussle over Unfinished Homes

    November 13, 2013 —
    Rivard, Florida has been trying to get rid of a group of unfinished homes destroyed. Now Hernando County officials have decreed that the partially-built homes are unsafe and must be demolished. However, after the building permits were withdrawn, Costa Homes filed a lawsuit asking that they be reinstated. The county had given the builder a deadline to file new permits, but were met with a lawsuit. Costa Homes seeks to be relived of the county’s requirement that each of the six homes be provided with $10,000 bond and also finds the county’s completion schedule to be “so short it constitutes a prescription for failure.” Building officials had declared the structures unsafe in August and had stipulated that they had to be made safe. Read the full story...

    Design & Construction Case Expands Florida’s Slavin Doctrine

    January 21, 2015 —
    According to Amanda Baggett of Rogers Towers, Florida’s “Fourth District Court of Appeal appears to have expanded the Slavin doctrine in the context of design professional liability” in the case McIntosh v. Progressive Design and Engineering, Inc. (Jan. 7, 2015). McIntosh, a personal injury case, involved whether the design and construction of an intersection with multiple traffic signals in close proximity created confusion for drivers. Baggett stated that McIntosh expanded the Slavin doctrine in two ways: “first, the ruling eliminates the requirement that the ultimate owner of a project accept the project before the Slavin doctrine may be invoked. Second, the decision applies the Slavin doctrine to completed and accepted design plans without regard to the completion of the project for which they were prepared.” Read the full story...

    Civility Is Key in Construction Defect Mediation

    February 12, 2013 —
    Eugene Heady of Smith Currie & Hancock reminds those involved in construction disputes to “lay down the swords.” Yes, it’s an adversarial situation, but “mediating parties must understand that courtesy, candor, and cooperation on the part of their respective lawyers will help contain the conflict and help resolve the dispute more quickly and efficiently.” Instead of doing battle with the opposition, Mr. Heady says that one should “approach mediation as an opportunity to solve a complex problem, rather than an opportunity for conquest over one’s enemy.” Read the full story...

    The One New Year’s Resolution You’ll Want to Keep if You’re Involved in Public Works Projects

    January 07, 2015 —
    New Year’s resolutions are hard to keep. In fact, studies (which I have a sneaking suspicion may have been paid for by the tobacco, donut and vacation timeshare lobbies) have found that only 8% of New Year’s resolutions are kept. But, here’s one you’ll want to make sure you keep. Mandatory Registration and Notice Requirements If you’re a public works contractor or subcontractor you only have until March 1, 2015 to register through the California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) to bid and enter into public works contracts on state and local public works projects. And if you’re a state or local public agency you must provide notice of the DIR’s new registration requirements in all call for bids and contract documents beginning January 1, 2015. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Wendel Rosen Black & Dean LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@wendel.com

    Distressed Home Sales Shrinking

    October 22, 2014 —
    According to Molly Boesel in CoreLogic, “Distressed sales (REO and short sales) accounted for 11.2 percent of total home sales in August 2014, the lowest share since December 2007 and a strong improvement from the same time a year ago when this category made up 15 percent of total sales.” Michigan had the largest amount of distressed sales, with 25.5 percent in August, while California “saw the largest improvement from peak distressed sales share of any state, falling 55.3 percent from the January 2009 peak share of 67.4 percent.” Read the full story...

    Pennsylvania: When Should Pennsylvania’s New Strict Products Liability Law Apply?

    February 05, 2015 —
    Pennsylvania has maintained its own peculiar brand of strict products liability law ever since the Supreme Court decided Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.[1] in 1978. Maligned by many as “absurd and unworkable,”[2] if “excessively” orientated towards plaintiffs,[3] Azzarello’s unique approach to the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965)[4] has recently been judicially consigned to the dustbin of history. In Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc.,[5] decided on November 19, 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court expressly overruled Azzarello leaving in its place a new alternative standards approach to proving a Section 402A claim. An injured worker or subrogated insurer[6] must still prove that the seller, whether a manufacturer or a distributor, placed the product on the market in a “defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the consumer.”[7] But now, under Tincher, a plaintiff must use either a “consumer expectation test” or a “risk-utility test” to establish that criterion.[8] Reprinted courtesy of Robert Caplan, White and Williams LLP and Timothy Carroll, White and Williams LLP Mr. Caplan may be contacted at caplanr@whiteandwilliams.com; Mr. Carroll may be contacted at carrollt@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...