BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Howard Pennsylvania office building expert witness Howard Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Howard Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Howard Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Howard Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Howard Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Howard Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Howard Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Howard Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Howard Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Howard Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Howard Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Howard Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Howard Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Howard Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Howard Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Howard Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Howard Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Howard Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Howard Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Howard Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Howard Pennsylvania
    Howard Pennsylvania civil engineering expert witnessHoward Pennsylvania construction cost estimating expert witnessHoward Pennsylvania eifs expert witnessHoward Pennsylvania architectural engineering expert witnessHoward Pennsylvania construction claims expert witnessHoward Pennsylvania expert witness roofingHoward Pennsylvania construction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Howard, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Howard Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101

    Howard Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844

    Howard Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360

    Howard Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Clearfield County Chapter
    Local # 3903
    PO Box 512
    Clearfield, PA 16830

    Howard Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Gr Dubois Area
    Local # 3959
    PO Box 664
    Du Bois, PA 15801
    Howard Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803

    Howard Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030

    Howard Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Howard Pennsylvania


    BLOK, a Wired UK Hottest 100 Housing Market Startup, Gets Funding from a Renowned Group of Investors

    Two New Developments in Sanatoga, Pennsylvania

    Federal Magistrate Judge Recommends Rescission of Policies

    New Rule Prohibits Use of Funds For Certain DoD Construction and Infrastructure Programs and Projects

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Ursinus is Cleared!”

    Equipment Costs? It’s a Steal!

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    #5 CDJ Topic: David Belasco v. Gary Loren Wells et al. (2015) B254525

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    New California Standards Go into Effect July 1st

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2021 Super Lawyers Rising Stars!

    Mortgagors Seek Coverage Under Mortgagee's Policy

    No Duty to Defend Under Renter's Policy

    Storm Eunice Damage in U.K. Could Top £300 Million

    Wyoming Supreme Court Picks a Side After Reviewing the Sutton Rule

    New Iowa Law Revises Construction Defects Statute of Repose

    Green Cement? You Bet!

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Brings Professional Development Series to Their Houston Office

    Client Alert: Court of Appeal Applies Common Interest Privilege Doctrine to HOA Litigation Meetings

    State And Local Bid Protests: Sunk Costs and the Meaning of a “Win”

    The “Colorado American Dream Act:” H.B. 25-1272’s Construction Defect Reforms

    Two Paths to Industrialized Construction: Lessons from China

    So You Want to Arbitrate? Better Make Sure Your Contract Covers All Bases

    Structure of Champlain Towers North Appears Healthy

    Construction Contract Language and Insurance Coverage Must Be Consistent

    Ethical Limits on Preparing a Witness for Deposition or Trial

    Waiving Consequential Damages—What Could Go Wrong?

    Measure Twice, Cut (the Check) Once: Liability for Cybercrime and How to Avoid It

    Seyfarth’s Construction and Government Contracts Teams Named 2024 Practice Groups of the Year by Law360

    E-Commerce Logistics Test Limits of Tilt-Up Construction

    How Labor Law Fraud in New York Works: A Step-by-Step Primer on the Latest Construction Accident Scheme

    Lawsuit Decries Environmental Assessment for Buffalo, NY, Expressway Cap Project

    Court Says No to Additional Lawyer in Las Vegas Fraud Case

    Connecticut Expands Construction Wage-Theft Liability and Prevailing Wage Recordkeeping Requirements

    New Home Sales Slip, but Still Strong

    Supreme Court of New Jersey Reviews Statutes of Limitation and the Discovery Rule in Construction Defect Cases

    No Trial Credit in NJ Appellate Decision for Non-Settling Successive Tortfeasors – Must Demonstrate Proof of Initial Tortfeasor Negligence and Proximate Cause

    UK SFO Makes Arrests in European Data Center Bribery Probe

    NYC Developer Embraces Religion in Search for Condo Sites

    The Other Side of the North Dakota Oil Boom: Evictions

    Toll Brothers Report End of Year Results

    Contract, Breach of Contract, and Material Breach of Contract

    The ALI Restatement – What Lies Ahead?

    “Rip and Tear” Damage Remains Covered Under CGL Policy as “Accident”—for Now.

    Arctic Fires Are Melting Permafrost That Keeps Carbon Underground

    Wisconsin Court Enforces Breach of Contract Exclusion in E&O Policy

    Anti-Fracking Win in N.Y. Court May Deal Blow to Industry

    OSHA/VOSH Roundup

    Florida Appellate Court Holds Four-Year Statute of Limitations Applicable Irrespective of Contractor Licensure

    City of Birmingham Countersues Contractor for Incomplete Work
    Corporate Profile

    HOWARD PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Howard, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Howard, Pennsylvania

    Lienor Dealing With “Show Cause” Summons by Condominium Unit Owner

    September 01, 2026 —
    One of the statutory vehicles to shorten a construction lienor’s statute of limitations to foreclose on a construction lien is through a “show cause” summons that essentially requires the lienor to foreclose on the lien within 20 days from receipt of the “show cause” summons. This is a statutory procedure under Florida’s Lien Law in Fla. Stat. s. 713.21(4). If a lienor receives a “show cause” summons and lawsuit, the lienor should, without delay, counterclaim or file a separate lien foreclosure lawsuit within the 20-day period without exception. This is provided the lienor wants to move forward with its lien. If a lienor does not, the lien will be discharged of record. If you are a lienor and receive a “show cause” summons, please immediately consult with construction counsel that can best advise you and perfect your lien rights. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Trend Continues Where Unlicensed Contractors Have No Recourse

    July 13, 2026 —
    There’s been a recent trend in Florida case law that has figuratively “killed” unlicensed contractors. Here’s another one. The moral to this trend and case is simple: make sure you have the proper licenses prior to serving as a contractor under Florida law. Trying to be cute, as seemed to be the situation in this case with a creative argument, is not an argument that will carry the day and your resources will be devoted to being creative versus the ultimate merits of the dispute. In Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski, 2026 WL 1649571 (S.D.Fla. 2026) an owner of real property hired a company to design and construct a spec home on the property. The company and its owner were NOT licensed contractors. The contract stated the company was serving as a “spec developer” and referred to it as the contractor throughout the contract. Other than this, the contract was set up as a cost plus a fee. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Leaders in Dispute Resolution Need to Make Unbiased Decisions for Mediation to Succeed

    March 31, 2026 —
    As a mediator helping to settle construction disputes and as an arbitrator deciding outcomes of these disputes, I found certain lessons to be especially helpful after graduating last summer from the Executive Education program at Harvard Kennedy School (HKS). The exceptional HKS curriculum included courses focused on negotiation strategies for multiparty disputes, decisive leadership during crisis, and human behavior affecting dispute resolution. In particular, our HKS class debated the impact of cognitive bias in dispute resolution, and we studied a central theme that decision-making is universally scientific. That is, parties making decisions in dispute resolution exhibit and rely upon empirical factors that good mediators and decision makers should appreciate and understand. Bias, for example, can cause key players to discount persuasive witnesses, admissible evidence, and reliable expert opinions that influence the outcome of a construction dispute. Biased decision makers may also choose to withhold key information from the mediator, as though doing so will help rather than hurt what is supposed to be an objective and diplomatic process. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Rick G. Erickson, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Erickson may be contacted at rerickson@swlaw.com

    Travelers Injury Impact Report Highlights Longer Recovery Times Amid Declining Injury Rates

    May 05, 2026 —
    HARTFORD, Conn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TRV) today released its 2026 Injury Impact Report, an analysis of more than 1.2 million workers compensation claims received by the company from 2021 through 2025. The report finds that even as workplace injury rates decline, the injuries that do occur are growing more complex and taking longer to heal – a trend driven by an aging workforce and the disproportionate vulnerability of first-year employees. “The decrease in workplace injuries is a positive story, yet injured workers are still missing an average of 80 workdays,” said Claude Howard, Vice President of Workers Compensation Claim at Travelers. “This report is a reminder that progress doesn’t mean the risk environment requires any less attention, and an employer’s commitment to safety must keep pace with an ever-evolving workforce and injury landscape.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Travelers Companies, Inc.

    Structural Concerns Force Emergency Closure of Maryland Office Building

    August 16, 2026 —
    A 10-story Baltimore-area office building was evacuated after an underground parking structure was compromised during construction work. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Negate State Law Requirement to File a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint in a Federal Action Against a Design Professional

    April 27, 2026 —
    To deter frivolous and unfounded claims against design professionals, states throughout the country have enacted statutes which generally require litigants to furnish a formal certification of merit (“COM”) from a qualified expert or face potential dismissal of their lawsuit. These COM statutes can impose a significant front-end burden on claimants who must pay an expert to review project records, interview the project team, and prepare a formal report before the lawsuit can be filed—often regardless of the amount in controversy. However, in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in a medical malpractice case, most, if not all of these statutes, may no longer be enforceable in federal court. This article examines the recent decision in Berk v. Choy, 146 S. Ct. 546 (2026), the decisions thus far which have applied Berk to invalidate COM statutes, and other categories of statutes applicable to the construction industry which may face a similar fate. The U.S. Supreme Court Decision (Berk v. Choy) In Berk, the plaintiff, Harold Berk, sued a doctor for medical malpractice under Delaware law in Delaware federal court. 146 S. Ct. at 551. Under Del. Code, Tit. 18, § 6853(a)(1), an affidavit of merit (like a COM) must accompany a complaint alleging medical malpractice. Id. Berk failed to include an affidavit of merit with his complaint. Id. at 552. Applying Delaware state law, the federal court dismissed Berk’s medical malpractice claim. Berk appealed to the Third Circuit, arguing that the affidavit of merit required by § 6853(a)(1) is unenforceable in federal court because it is more onerous than the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling, finding § 6853(a)(1) enforceable in federal court. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Phillip Boldt, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com Mr. Boldt may be contacted at pboldt@pecklaw.com Read the full story...